How to document gang stalking for a civil lawsuit: simple counter-measures and evidence collection (Hi El Salvador)

” I am not anti-government: I am anti-corruption in government.” ROGS

There are many ways to validate that “organized gang stalking” is a real thing, derived from the era between COINTELPRO and the CIA’s drug wars, when hidden and illegal police actions targeted “organized crime” and “gang control” using “gang strike forces” as a means to contain them, blackmail or compromise them, or sell them to the system if they failed to cut a deal. Here is a peek back at that era, where we see “bad jacketing” as a means to an end of crushing local economies, and fueling social panics about “the other.”

[UPDATE 10-18-2017: Yup-the cat’s out of the bag alright-as we see that another well documented aspect of organized gang stalking has been validated in the main stream media. The whisper campaign took down Harvey Weinstein-but not until AFTER his films made many women-and his corporate subscribers– filthy rich. The whisper campaign is a well documented racist, religious fanatic tool of social control that was deployed in Israel by Zionists seeking to cause stress, and pain to native Palestinians during the Palestinian Exodus of 1948. Like an infection, it has spread around the world, and OGS is it’s symptom]

Modern OGS for the most part,  is a recruitment scheme, or a eugenics tool, or an influence operation, but shares little in regard to legitimate investigatory methods or legal basis; also, for the most part it just f@cks with people’s heads in a variety of ways. And, as we see, the whisper campaign, aka official source gossip-is it’s main feature. So, look at the local chapters of pro-zionist organizations around you to begin naming names (most police departments train in Israel these days, and Rotary Clubs and many other sects and cults do too).

You can drive yourself crazy wondering what they are up to (and if you have read this blog you have a cue that western democracies have become lawless states), and you can buy all kinds of counter-surveillance gear, like laser sound smashers and more, but really, there are more basic steps you need to take. LIke researching your stalkers the way they are researching you. Here is a suite of freeware and payware tools from Einvestigator.com.

Most modern OGS starts or ends with chronic and pervasive hacking, and redirection through warrantless wiretapping of our computers. So, start with “screen capture” software, which you can get for free online. As you have likely noticed, “they” mess with your computer all the time, frequently causing it to have “a mind of its own.”

And because most targets are low status, low income individuals with weak social support, I advise you to look at the case I documented here, where stalking BY police is used as a tool to “squeeze” a target,  or possibly force them into into confessing for a crime as I have noted elsewhere, mind control is a feature in false confessions.

These cases have all the ‘trappings’. I make no claim to support criminality, I believe in a society of laws and due process; but I also realize that we live in a state of affairs where LEO’s are frequently acting criminally- that the “rogue officer” and the “bad apple” have infected policing as a whole, and in fact, frequently head the department. And then, they have taken over nearly every online dialectic BY DESIGN, and frequently hack and harass people who are not even aware they are “targets,”because 17 agencies in America alone are targeting our internet and cell phones every day, and every election.

It’s not a few bad apples-it’s a moldy barrel of apple vinegar, full of rotten pickled pork.

These are “make work projects” on a grand and unimaginable scale, in a climate where “to serve and protect” has been replaced by ” to monitor, harass and database, until we own you”-and you could be in their sites as a vulnerable person, and a actua taret of their well-hidden, and previously illegal practices. So, getting real evidence is important, and you can refer to the tools section of this blog to begin to document your stalking.

What is evidence in a court room? “Evidence” with pictures, from Wisegeek.com

Here below is one way to prove that gang stalking is “real”: blog statistics which indicate that people from around the world are interested in the topic, and many people are researching it-so it has affected them as well. Here is a screen capture of it in action, as this blog records ‘hits’ and noes “what they are reading” This blog attracts a particularly educated crowd, as the posts they hit indicate high level organization of their thinking.

And also, note which countries are checking in-some 5-12 per day, reading an average of 50-75 posts. And frequently, it is clear in the data that someone who is “profiling” me, the author is reading, based in the posts they choose; while other times it s clear that someone else is clearly “chaining” the posts into a narrative, while others are seeking help:

yesterday

Then, because police departments, and others with a “police personality” are integral, as they work with any of a number of hidden agents and agencies, NGO’s and “cause” based organizations that also save cute puppies and kitties from activists, critical thinkers, pedophiles and terrorists and journalists and whistle blowers; waging war on the Constitutional rights of due process (such as the right to be left alone, or to NOT not spied on by our own governments, or your government, not yet enumerated), we literally have Fusion Centers acting as free speech disrupter’s online. (and the United Nations having deployed resources to manipulate our online discourse, and our interactions, as well as to socially engineer us as if we are tools in their toolkit; and tis, which frequently comes offline, as we see with the Transatlantic Crime Initiative, and more).

While their activity is difficult to document-I have on several occasions traced their IP’s while my computer was under attack, or heard them talking to each other over my computer’s speaker, in the background as they learned how to turn my computer mic on. This happened many years ago-and was one of the ways I knew before others did that we are watched, and manipulated in real time.

This shot below is just one example that shows new, un-named networks that come and go, and increase or decrease in numbers, which can be compared to those that are always present. Especially note “DerSchwartzCo” which means “The Black Company” in German:

all those new networks and none happnin

This or a similar internet/wireless mechanism in action, but also, the next shot that demonstrates brighting in action, as the squad cars circle the house, using the spotlight to inflict Panoptical terrorism on someone who documented OGS with security camera’s. In this case, the cameras were as much the target as was the psychological terror and political intimidation. This case happened to activists against police brutality, artists, poets, and community organizers, a few Muslims, atheists and secular humanists, and it spanned a period of a decade, at several locations.

Counter intelligence manuals usually have a section about how to “use someone’s camera’s against them,” and so on, and this is one example of how this is done, as lights are shined from both the front and the back of the house.

brighting g front again.png

 

But there are other ways that lights are used to signal, and many of the online talk of “brighting” is actually gang stalkers talking to each other. This story, by Rachel Aviv chronicles a state sponsored gang stalking where headlights were used in “brighting”, and the framing of innocent suspects, and the eventual kidnapping of a child was the goal (this is frequently the goal of OGS, as the DVIC is a lucrative industry, where the Fed incentivizes child theft). The Beatrice Six were eventually convicted of a heinous crime, due  to the stalking, jailing, and then, the literal, and actual brainwashing of six people who were eventually exonerated in  “The Largest DNA Exoneration in US History.”

Here is another one as officers across the street called in round after round of squad car harassment for a period lasting years. Large white males, dressed in “street clothes” and with bad DEA type haircuts and wigs occupied the dwellings across the street, and a variety of street theater took place regularly. My favorite was “the day of the umbrellas” where morons paraded around my house carrying umbrellas-on a day with no rain!  And, in an area where umbrellas are not common UNLESS there is rain. Others have documented the umbrella phenomenon as well, and it appears in several old narratives of intelligence agencies. It was this one incident which caused me to buy security cameras for the first time.

The war was on me, personally, since 2003-4 when I wrote a story that the DVIC profiteers didn’t like, and I refused to compromise my narrative; and, this war was on first amendment protected activity, community organizers, and others, but also, the cameras in this case were specifically targeted, and frequently destroyed, as well as actual attacks on several “speakers.” It is important to note that the beat cops in this case were likely unaware of the larger and more extensive picture of endemic corruption, and thus were ‘ just doin’ their jobs.’:

hazing 4.png

Then, using the tools described in the section of this blog about “how to fight back” by documenting OGS, there are many free “electronic tools” available online that you can use to document your own stalking and electronic harassment. These days, because the targets are frequently our emails, and our computers (and note to those who subvert justice: I have not anonymized these screen captures, for a specific reason, not least f which were the computer attacks tat this writer endured shortly after publishing this post.)

(Note to the reader-if you post something online, be aware that images, and documents contain “fingerprints” that include your computer address, called an IP, location, and more You can get an “anonymizer” free online in order to hide your tracks-but I prefer to leave tracks sometimes, deliberately, and with a specific purpose which I will not at this time reveal.)

This screenshot refers to a particular group who was using the well known trope of the “FBI SURVEILLANCE VAN” or other wireless “names” aka “wireless AP’s” which was one of many that came and went, got close and then far away.

Note how the signal strength drops dramatically, and spikes, or others that go flat. Going flat can indicate that a Stingray or other fake cell phone/wireless tower has killed all the signals, or otherwise contained them.

This screenshot is what a hidden wireless environment looks like when it is being tampered with via the use of a “StingRay” or “Hailstorm” or other hidden, disruptive device.There are many of them, and many surveillance tactical approaches,but here is one method:

imsi-catcherdiagram.jpg

 

And here below is one screen capture that I documented of thousands. Note that the actual phrase there’s no wifi here the third to the last AP to the bottom, was a phrase derived from a comment spoken in that residence that very day,  by a person who lived there. This is one or another form of “wiretap” and that AP came and went, changed names a few more times, and then disappeared forever into the sunset. Also notice how the color of the line that indicates a “channel” changes in mid-broadcast, as the operator had changed their wireless AP ‘on the fly’:

NOTICE THE SMARTASS THERE'S NO WIFI HERE

Then, there’s the standard forms of just keeping notes, or writing about it, which themselves are “evidentiary”. Once upon a time, a journalists word was his/her bond, and sources were to be protected at penalty of freedom. These days, these multi-headed Hydra’s stalk journalists and seek to discredit us with horrible and hidden practices. So, words are documentary, but they also will seek to “use the against you.”

So, I advise that you use tens of millions of words, and feed them some word salad-but also, to code meaning into your words in a way such as that you can recall other parts of the story later. In my case, since 2003-4, and long after I could write meaningful sstores, because I have been literally staked across the country for over a decade, and watched every dirty internet trick they have up their sleeve’s-and which the Intercept and Edward Snowden have also revealed.

But these are just a few examples of court room worthy evidence to document OGS, from actual TI’s experience.

Bearing in mind the ongoing harassment and 10 year long chronic sonic assaults that Rick and Cindy Krlich are enduring in Hubbard Ohio from their fire department, the local police, and hundreds of “associates”  even video tape and low level civil suits aren’t always enough when dealing with corrupt prosecutors, and city governments and others that utilize OGS as a means of suppressing dissent, or framing, assaulting, or harassing activists, petty vendetta’s, or individual opposition.

SO these methods above will supplement your evidence in real and verifiable instances of OGS.

Then, there is the issue of filing a lawsuit in the first place. I offer this blog as a study manual, not as a legal or other template, and so, provide this information with which to streamline your own research.

Jeffrey Kantor, who was harassed for being Jewish and more, was let go fromm a security clearanced job in a primarily Christian community, and was one of the first to try to articulate a lawsuit and document the sheer scope and wide ranging, rambling insanity that these stalkers and teir stalkings take on, and so far, he has not been successful in his case because online, few have taken the risk to articulate this “phenomenon” the way that I have, with a few exceptions being the clearly focused and verifiable sourced “www.fightgangstalking.com” and the excellent work of Keith LaBella Esq., or the personal testimony of Dr. Eric Karlstrom, professor Emeritus at Cal State ( I will be contacting these shortly to point them to this blog).

Here is Kantor’s attempt at suing the Feral government, and his attempt at suing his former employer Appian follows herein (who I estimate was the most likely source of his harassment, as many retired LEO’s and FBI agents work in the private corporate security sector, and utilize LEIU data) Kantor v. Appian Corporation

Then there is the issue of corroborating testimony, which can strengthen your documentation. Here I document the organized gang stalking of five other people, all of them lawyers or reporters under siege from police gang stalking, or local “progressive’s” whose pet causes and nefarious database abuses pad the bankroll of police unions everywhere.

When it comes to witnesses, credibility is important but it is not “everything.” In one recent case where I documented database abuse and what was a likely breach of data in one of the largest identity management databases in the world, the “whistle blower” had an “unimpeachable” testimony. But AFTER local political interests, corporate supervisors and corporate security agents and others got involved, and a “narrative” was created, this formerly “unimpeachable” witness became a “racist liar” and was “framed” in “official” records, with the irony being that she herself belongs to a category of ethnic minority in America. And worth noting is that this happened in an election year.

SO, being that OGS is largely case by case, and also, civil conspiracies that border on, and frequently cross over into criminality, they can extend over long periods of time, so details are important. Don’t LOSE yourself in details, but document the pertinent, and easy to explain ones. If electronics are used, get an RF or “Trimeter” with a printout, or even common GPS locators and video.

Now: electronic discovery is where you, the victim, petition your ISp to hold records of being hacked, or of your internet connection being subverted; or of other web harassment. ED is in fact, the future of civil and criminal cases, and while LEO’s and others are fully exploiting control of electronic data, the current body politic s unaware of this feature of the “case creation” component and then the complexity involved in “proving” malicious prosecution, or other malfeasance.

This would take a whole chapter to document, but suffice it to say that the current structure of law and practice has it that agents and LEO’s can mine data today, and mine to selectively to erase or simply “not discover” exculpatory evidence, and simply outwait the ISP’s ability to maintain the data trail, as well as to erase a record of the “black operations” that preceded that trail-and then LEO’s can jump in and prosecute cases knowing that the defense is crippled by time alone.

Because these cases of the future entail entrapment, or analyses, or ‘discovery’ since 2001, and have floated around in a hidden database for decades* Then, there is the feature that was built into this corruption on the front end: that “big data” is forcing common American’s to forego privacy rights and more, and eventually get us to ‘beg for data capture’ and then to beg for access to it  as if they are doing us a favor.

BUT: every app, every device, every webclick leaves several trails that can be used to document a case of OGS. Up until now, what has been missing s an explication of ‘the dark side’ where internet operators and operations which leave a trail are themselves masked and hidden, leaving any plaintiff in the dark as to what EXACTLY is going on at the internet switch. Hopefully, this blog can help answer that for future case reference.

*The case of Ross Ulbricht will one daay be seen as a groundbraking case whereby authorities were able to 1) create a suspect nearly from whole cloth with enticement ad inducement 2) to profit from the case by making “black money” through this person and to hide that fact 3) to create other whole cloth cases after that 4) and to cover their tracks nearly without oversight.

In a world where civil asset forfeiture (as in the case of Kim Dotcom) is the goal, and money is the reward, the lack of oversight of agencies tasked with “fighting crime” have in fact flipped the script and become very adept at using others to appear to be criminal; and the government getting free money after inducing others into crime is the reward.

 

 

Advertisements