The reader might have noticed that gang stalking is gaining credibility as a valid complaint online, and calling it by its proper name: counter-intelligence and police stalking
,as we see in this example where a couple reporters and sociologists held a forum about “the stalker state.”
And, we also see that forums like Reddit and main stream news have begun to cover stories that walk the fine line between covering gang stalking as what it is “a rampant abuse of counter-terrorism funding and propaganda, and high policing as pretext to target the ‘usual suspects:’ the poor, the disenfranchised, the vulnerable, and the marginalized; the dissident voice, and the non-ADL infiltrated activist.”
Related: Read this brilliant Reddit analysis about how the One Percent have inter-linked their tribal-sectarian racism with artificial intelligence, and the nefarious Facebook and other CIA InQtel startups.
Then, read how ROGS Analysis has scientifically predicted key elements of a recent mass shooting, and also that racists are using labelling theory and framing people online, using military grade psychological operations, targeted at individuals.
And the main stream news is aware that they have been asked to put a “spin” on complaints of gang stalking that make it to a court room or two, because their fakenews depends upon near-mythical badguys, and wolf’s at the door that can be relegated to delusional complaints. All western Jewish-Christian-Abrahamic societies work from that level of fakemyth in order to substantiate and affirm their story telling basis based in superstition, and that superstition backed by actual human sacrifices (the Jesus myth is the classic example.)
Here is a case of this EXACT media framing in action, as we see a guy involved in drugs, and murdering another guy, just after he gets a “strange phone call about gang staking.”
Notice that the phone call is described as a “prank,” which seems to require more evidence, and more exploration, because the ROGS thesis holds that it was actually a deep state, or OTB black ops police tactic, or involvement of OTB snitches; or who were directly connected to Fusion Center tracking, and other elements .
In other words, ROGS is saying that this crime-like so many we see today-is possibly and likely the direct result of state leave actors using the obscured tactics of counter-terrorism tactic of gang stalking, and it CAUSED or CONTRIBUTED to a homicide (and keep in mind that the ROGS purpose is to destroy the ability of LEO’s to continue to mask bad behavior, and use illegal tactics and methods while cowering behind the thin veneer of counter-terrorism).
For reference, I have highlighted the relevant text, or linked it to other ROGS posts that discuss how gang stalking tactics affect cases “in darkness”and note that one of the metrics of measuring the ineffectiveness of counter terror gang stalking is that actual homicides are carried out, and many of those are a direct result of this neverending harrassment of targets, as we saw in the Virginia Beach shooting, Ian Long, Mathew Riehl, and many others:
[Prosecutor]Smith argued that the level of violence indicates it was not self-defense.
“A picture can be worth a thousand words, and I think this picture says a lot,” Smith said as he flashed a grisly photo of Maulding’s body across a large screen. “He beat him to a pulp.”
Reichow’s defense attorney, Sean Downs, argued that there are two sides to every story and “sometimes three, four, five. It’s not always going to fit together perfectly for you,” he told the jury.
What the attorneys do seem to agree on is that Reichow and Maulding had been hanging out earlier in the day. They were picked up by another friend, Anne Tanninen, from Maulding’s house and went to a storage unit that Tanninen had rented.
The trio was inside the storage space when Tanninen received a strange phone call, Smith said, from someone talking about $5,000, drugs and picking something up. He said both Reichow and Tanninen shared paranoid beliefs about the world, and they thought they were being “gang stalked.” Gang stalking can include being harassed by an organized group of people.
Up until the call, which turned out to be a prank, nothing was out of the ordinary, Smith said. The trio were unloading some items at the storage space, and Maulding was toying around with a bat inside the unit, he said.
Tanninen became upset after the call, however, and started arguing with Reichow, Smith said. She and Maulding confronted Reichow about possibly being associated with the call.
Downs said Maulding started taunting Reichow with the bat, saying “Come here, boy. Come here, boy.” Maulding, who had been drinking earlier in the day, was still intoxicated and threatened Reichow, Downs said.
Or, perhaps the reader today has noticed that Big Tech like Facebook is being indicted BY IT’S OWN CORPORATE OFFICERS as sick and exploitative manipulators of public discourse, AND psychological processes that amount to mind disruption.
Here-from yesterday’s news, is something that I wrote about many months ago, before the MSM picked it up-yet another Facebook CEO/investor/developer has come forwards to blow the whistle on the practice of manipulating dopamine levels in our brains. Keep in mind that their investors are largely drawn from the jingoistic Jewish-Christian fold, for whom no excess of cultic or chemical abuse of children is ever enough to satisfy their bulimic hunger):
“CHAMATH PALIHAPITIYA, A former Facebook executive has spoken out against the social network he helped to create, saying it is ‘ripping society apart'”Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5167631/Former-Facebook-exec-say-site-ripping-apart-society.html#ixzz514datIrP
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
He cited an incident in India where hoax messages about kidnappings shared on WhatsApp led to the lynching of seven innocent people, according to reports in The Verge.
During his talk, Mr Palihapitiya called out not only Facebook, but Silicon Valley’s entire system of funding.
He claimed money pumped into the region would be better spent addressing problems like climate change and disease.
Speaking to an audience at Stanford Graduate School of Business, Mr Palihapitiya said: ‘I think we have created tools that are ripping apart the social fabric of how society works.
‘The short-term, dopamine-driven feedback loops we’ve created are destroying how society works.
‘No civil discourse, no cooperation; misinformation, mistruth.
‘And it’s not an American problem — this is not about Russians ads. This is a global problem.’
This is not the first time that prominent figure at Facebook has spoken out about the social network.
For those of you who use such products, my heart goes out to you, and I hope you can read through ROGS here and find “the help you need” to possibly begin a class action lawsuit that will provably be bigger than Big Tobacco if we do it right.
But I haven’t personally used social media since 2005-6, and have never used the social network’s except AS investigative tools, for reasons that I will write about later (it started with total hacking of all my email and academic accounts for nearly a decade, between 2003-13).
But it will take a lawsuit against Facebook and other social media which will expose the multi-headed hydra’s and other monsters that our governments have been pointing at our minds in a direct webterrogation of our personalities, our intentions, our hopes and dreams-and a direct influence operation on our choices, and that, through direct manipulation of our free will, via dopamine.But I would go one step further, and state that the internet itself, weaponized by the FiveEyes, has literally designed this effect.
Related Stories: Where does the NSA end and Facebook begin? Facebook and its investors range from CIA butt boys like Peter Thiel, to Hong Kong mobster’s such as Li Ka- Shing, to standard front companies, to Goldman Sachs.And, how the FBI and NSA made Facebook the perfect surveillance tool after the great Culling of 2001.
Facebook executives admit deliberately manipulating dopamine levels in children to create “positive feedback loops.” Is it possible then, that they also help or enable negative feedback loops? I think Devin Kelley and many other “terrorists” mass shooters are examples of that, as I have studied this since 2005, being fully aware that the internet is “interactive” without our informed consent.
So, the War on Terror is ACTUALLY a war on ideas, and the people who have them-it is a cover operation for mass mind control. Literally using dopamine manipulation and propaganda tactics that other Facebook executives have called “brainwashing on a level that Edward Bernay’s could never have imagined as he powered Hitler, and Big Tobacco.’ But it is also an assault on individuals, and many of thse individuals that LEO’s and all the counter-terror hero’s can use as unpaid HUMINT to lead them to cases that they otherwise could NOT access.
And worse, because of the egregious and outrageous hidden mechanisms, and unchecked, un-monitored use of tactics, and toys and tools of OGS beyond the knowledge of courts of law, we see that citizens are robbed of free will, and instead, are used as unpaid labor that drives federal funding initiatives. This is what “high policing” is and how it has affected society-and individual cases-at large.
Again, do your own research, but there is an over-whelming bunch of evidence and data is increasing that indicates this is true. While George Orwell got it right about Big Government, he missed the part where government would use corporations as front companies, like any CIA operation ever, but this time, it is 17 agencies waging the ongoing Operation MHCHAOS, with augmented internet that targets “bad ideas” and “PRISM’s” and “XKEYSCORES” of words, mind mapping, and SOCMINT profiles long before the activist, dissident, whistle blower, or others, sometimes criminals, get targeted for “disruption.”
And, failing THAT, we now see that “destruction” soon follows, as in the case of the mass shooters, homicides, petty crimes, and more.
The only thing that can be said at this time about the “delusion” of gang stalking, and backed with ROGS Predictive Analysis, and empirical evidence is that psychologists like Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, et al. also share funding sources, and utilize ATAP damage control narratives, every time another layer of this un-constitutional policing scheme is revealed.