I have provided many examples here that women, and feminism, or women’s violence takes different forms under the DVIC schema, not least of which is how NGO’s are used in politics, and the hidden subversions that take place on the internet as female’s work behind the scenes at colleges and universities; in the DHS and the FBI to craft a “social narrative.”
I have also countered the linkage between domestic violence and mass shooters, other than to say that these are likely precipitated BY the DVIC, working with Rotary Clubs and more. All of this is federally subsidized, and all of it adopts a aradigm that women have NO AGENCY in their own affairs; and I have presented evidence of that.
And, it is indisputable that women’s organizations from both secular and religious cultures, institutions, NGO’s and other “organized” social structures-and even the Cult of Isis, aka the cult of the Virgin derive funding from crisis PR intiatives that favor a narrative of ‘damsels in distress’ i curious twisting of actual feminism with the pseudo feminism of fascist designs. Pseudo-feminist gang stalking and faux-heroism by “the good guys” is linked to nearly ALL OGS, with few exceptions in a lop-sided but profitable narrative.
Then there is how sex workers are exploited BY the DVIC, exploited in the narrative by police elements and NGO’s, and how real estate is a target of hidden “investigations” where sex workers and sex offenders are used as chess pieces in these schemes, by both sides of the political aisle.
Now, I will present one of the well known gang stalking blogs that has been online for many years, and without comment, I will note that an “alliance” or an agreement has been indicated by the writer with another writer, whose main claim is that they were bullied at Ulster University many years ago (academic stalking).
I say that I will not provide comment for a very specific reason, which has legal implications, but also, that these implications have bearing on my thesis that there is a link between active shooters and domestic violence-chiefly that the “good guys” stalk those they deem to be “bad guys” who challenge their lockup on narrative; and the tax dollar draining DVIC teats as well. In short: this connection is purely diabolical.
Here is some commentary from a well known blog mstmha , and a party who appears atlernately as “prayerwarriorpsychicnot” aka “Williams” aka SChurchill, aka “conartistocracy” aka “taknbsorbemwon5” I will let the reader decide what this arch of ROGS is inferring, but also, I have highlighted the interesting points, and especially note the linkage to Sam Vakhnin who writes about narcissistic abuse.
UPDATE 11/05/2019: I ask you, the reader, to go over to taknbsorbemwon 5s blog and notice that it is now, “closed ” after ROGS outed her as,a gangstalker who likely encourages, and incites mass shootings, but also was active during a major election cycle .
I suggest the reader click the link, as it is a telling exchange. And, I do not mean to infer that there is a relation specifically the two anonymous bloggers below, only that it is integral to the narrative of modern OGS to understand that women are both perpetrators AND victims of it:
June 16, 2014
Gang Stalker Ideology and The Exploitation Of The Working Class ( prayerwarriorpsychicnot explains)
You can find the original post at https://mstmha.wordpress.com/2014/06/14/ever-seen-an-employer-who-misrepresents-your-identity/.
The comment was, in my opinion, one of the best comments that I have read yet that explained how the working class (especially women) are being violated in the not-so war on terror but the new terror war. It really explained much about what we are up against as we continue to expose the very complex terrorism program that has many names; one of which is gang stalking. The comment also really opened the door to the mindsets of the very evil controllers of these present-day torture agendas.
One of my favorite lines from the post…
“If our ” superiors” can only maintain their superiority by cheating – if they can’t face competition on an even playing field, they expose their vulnerability and their own inferiority.”
Thanks again to the author at prayerwarriorpsychicnot on Word Press …
The Following Comment Made By…
Owen Jones “The Demonisation of the working Class”. O Jones asks when did “the salt of the earth” become “the scum of the earth”. Then he describes the attacks on working class communities and their vilification in the media. Post-war feminism by including middle class women in the old boys network, swallowed up ALL the higher level jobs that previously some working class men had achieved and working class women had aspired to. Now there was nowhere for them to be promoted to. At the same time working class jobs were moved overseas to cheap labour countries. My theory is the demonisation is happening because as workers we are now redundant and seen as a threat to the status quo. Although his book is focused on white working class in Britain much of it equally applies to indigenous people of colour, affected by the same circumstances.
I also have a theory that post-war, working class women (which also include women of colour) experienced huge improvements in their previously degrading social conditions. The war had lifted women’s employment. Post war welfare set a bench mark which prevented employers paying women below subsistence wages. Working class women were accessing higher education and competing with middle class men and women for jobs. Contraception and abortion enabled women from being thrown in the gutter due to “accidental” pregnancy. The social class that prostitutes came from were given the opportunity to reject sexploitation. Women who had previously been forced into prostitution were getting educated, supporting themselves, and competing with their social. “superiors” for jobs. The status quo was upset. This was good for working class women but the men wanted prostitutes, employers wanted dirt cheap labour, the police were losing out on the profits and pleasures of involvement with the sex industry, and nobody of higher rank wanted to compete on an even playing field with this previous class of near-slaves, for career jobs. I can’t think of any other reason why COINTELPRO would target feminist and lesbian groups. Keep the whatsits in their place, right?
Women were oppressed. Now they could walk away from bad relationships and support themselves. The oppressing men did not like that and they had a lot of allies (police, people wanting the old status quo back).
I have heard other Targets say their persecution started with an abusive ex-partner , then it morphed into gang stalking. Men have always done that – stalking by proxy and all that. (Vaknin)