The headline up there is an inside joke-it came from inside my head. You see, lot’s of people think that sooper seekrit agencies like the CIA listens to us all. But that’s not true! That’s crazy! And worse- a “potentially dangerous tribe of troubled minds” in the organized gang stalking online community are starting to talk about their troubles online! They must be stopped!
But the truth is, the CIA listens to some of us, more than others of us in this modern Operation Gladio/aka CHAOS. And: the star chambers wage battle between six pointed stars versus five pointed stars, and MORE CHAOS!!!! With some THIRTEENS thrown in to the lions den (lions are seldom reported to wear high heels, but there are exceptions. Like when the rotary wheel is used as a form of domestic NTT, and Mooses and Elks and Lions Bears conspire in High Heels Policing. Ooops. Bears are Russians-never mind)
Related Story: The Privacy Raping Boondoggle That is the NSA/FiveEyes-Israel (New Zealand) data theft pipeline. What’s in a name? The FOUR MILLION DOLLAR Thin Thread versus the FOUR BILLION DOLLAR Trailblazer.
And William Binney, who recently sat down with the CIA director, is one of those “troubled people.” He has even lent his name to the targeted individual community, to investigate gang stalking. Yeah, for real.
And the Washington Post-one of the deep states favorite places to take a leak-say’s “Binney is playing with fire!” Let me know if that sounds like a threatening/threat narrative laden headline (does the use of THAT word up my DHS “threat matrix score?”)-because that could indicate paranoia, and we would have to get you some mental health treatment. Maybe, the CIA’s Mormon torturers, Mitchell and Jessen could take a whack at you in a black site, and get YOU the help YOU need! Because psychologists are in on it at every level-to help you, of course.
Here-let’s have a look at what one of the Rubin Klan have to say about that meeting (you might start to see patterns in journalism when people who are in the Klan of Rubin show up pin a narrative. Here-look at this Rubin sand-witch- a serial rape hoaxer):
William Binney About to Get Tossed Into Sheol!!! According to Jennifer Rubin
My Post colleague Aaron Blake reports:
The Intercept just broke a pretty big story: CIA Director Mike Pompeo reportedly met with the purveyor of a disputed theory about the internal Democratic National Committee emails that were released last year — a theory that runs counter to the intelligence community’s own long-standing conclusions about the matter.
It’s not the first example of Pompeo doing something that has been put under microscope. But there is a common thread running through just about every example: Pompeo doing and saying questionable things involving Russia — and those questionable things tend to lean in a pro-Trump direction.
I still remember when “those people” said the “deep state” was a conspiracy theory-do you? Yeah, and now look-Google has 42 MILLION results for that exact term. Sorry, Dr’s Mike, and Lorraine, and David- but the troubled minds tribe is growing! And- deep state is really a code word for “traitors.”
And even our own government has noted that SOMEONE likely has an actual sound cannon that was used on our diplomats in Cuba. Never mind the narrative distortion that has gone on since this story broke-because “webwashing” is a real thing.
Ever notice how the things I write about here at ROGS happen in “real news” shortly after I get on the case? Yeah-it’s a pattern-my long term case of apophenia following me around like Gloria Ghost. You might have forgotten Gloria, so here is a picture of my damned sell in dis’ dress:
Well-who knew? My old neighbor Doug’s friend Pompeo called one of my favorite whistle blowers, William Binney into his star chamber the other day-no kidding. And I’m pretty sure that it was Doug who made it happen (Hi Doug! Where dd you disappear to anyways-and was REAL ESTATE involved?). So, I think now is a good time to revisit my “theory” of the horsehair worm in the crickets head, which I call “memetic neuro-fasciitis of the mind.”
Or, as you know it “the NSA data entrapment scheme that targets ALL American’s and uses the collected data to steal elections“ by harassing, manipulating, and “no touch torturing” political opponents of the deep state (aka the “gay mafia”) and so on.
You might remember Bill Binney as a true and real American Hero who built a sooper seekrit internet email and phone call interception machine back around 2001, the goal of which was to capture intelligence on FOREIGN spies and bad guys. But because his machine respected our Constitutional rights of due process, and was extremely cost effective, coming in just under FOUR MILLION- he was fired, and the NSA built a FOUR BILLION dollar machine instead, and targeted AMERICANS and politics. Then, they tossed that machine in the dumpster, and built one that cost 72 BILLION per year.
Well- how else to build and enforce, and police, and re-police a narrative that demands a climate of domestic terror??!! And how to get more monies for all those helpful, and hungry hungry hungry DVIC Gloria Bunnies in high heels? I have an idea! How about we AMERITHRAX the crap out of the narrative? Yeah! Go team black/red! Here- from Washington’s blog–have a look at the AMERITHRAX hoax, which claimed the lives of five American’s.
Good Ol’ FBI-I guess every totalitarian bankster state needs a domestic political police to suppress, intimidate, bully, frame, and harass journalists and dissenters and writers and save cute puppies and all that- to save them from those who break into our Windows 10 to get a grab at our kids, or wage years long black bag jobs. I mean-Hitler had the SS and all those brownshirted patriots stalking for Der Muterland, and Stalin had the Cheka and the NKDV, and who can forget how well the Stasi worked in East Germany as John LeCarre’ wrote about folks who tinker around behind the scenes and exploit the narrative itself(or whose asses get fatter by the day counting beans in the DHS right now)!?
Well anyways- if you have been following my writing for the last few years before this blog, you will see I have chronicled these deep state “disruption campaigns” since around 2004. Yeah- not a profitable business model, that’s for sure. BUT: a very important check against the balance sheet which is always hungry hungry hungry! Checks and balances–like alternative media and blogging– are the thinnest and most fragile threads that sew our democracy together, so that those who would-and can and do-tear us apart don’t get their way.
Here’s a bit from the VIPS memo, which is a complete refutation of the DNC “Russian Hacking” narrative, which documents INSTEAD a “someone most likely copied the data to a thumb drive” narrative (maybe the drive had a case of bad USB??):
MEMORANDUM FOR: The President
FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)
SUBJECT: Was the “Russian Hack” an Inside Job?
Forensic studies of “Russian hacking” into Democratic National Committee computers last year reveal that on July 5, 2016, data was leaked (not hacked) by a person with physical access to DNC computer. After examining metadata from the “Guccifer 2.0” July 5, 2016 intrusion into the DNC server, independent cyber investigators have concluded that an insider copied DNC data onto an external storage device.
Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying was performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies [see here and here].
Independent analyst Skip Folden, who retired after 25 years as the IBM Program Manager for Information Technology, US, who examined the recent forensic findings, is a co-author of this Memorandum. He has drafted a more detailed technical report titled “Cyber-Forensic Investigation of ‘Russian Hack’ and Missing Intelligence Community Disclaimers,” and sent it to the offices of the Special Counsel and the Attorney General. VIPS member William Binney, a former Technical Director at the National Security Agency, and other senior NSA “alumni” in VIPS attest to the professionalism of the independent forensic findings.
The recent forensic studies fill in a critical gap. Why the FBI neglected to perform any independent forensics on the original “Guccifer 2.0” material remains a mystery – as does the lack of any sign that the “hand-picked analysts” from the FBI, CIA, and NSA, who wrote the “Intelligence Community Assessment” dated January 6, 2017, gave any attention to forensics.
NOTE: There has been so much conflation of charges about hacking that we wish to make very clear the primary focus of this Memorandum. We focus specifically on the July 5, 2016 alleged Guccifer 2.0 “hack” of the DNC server. In earlier VIPS memoranda we addressed the lack of any evidence connecting the Guccifer 2.0 alleged hacks and WikiLeaks, and we asked President Obama specifically to disclose any evidence that WikiLeaks received DNC data from the Russians [see here and here].
Addressing this point at his last press conference (January 18), he described “the conclusions of the intelligence community” as “not conclusive,” even though the Intelligence Community Assessment of January 6 expressed “high confidence” that Russian intelligence “relayed material it acquired from the DNC … to WikiLeaks.”
Obama’s admission came as no surprise to us. It has long been clear to us that the reason the U.S. government lacks conclusive evidence of a transfer of a “Russian hack” to WikiLeaks is because there was no such transfer. Based mostly on the cumulatively unique technical experience of our ex-NSA colleagues, we have been saying for almost a year that the DNC data reached WikiLeaks via a copy/leak by a DNC insider (but almost certainly not the same person who copied DNC data on July 5, 2016).
From the information available, we conclude that the same inside-DNC, copy/leak process was used at two different times, by two different entities, for two distinctly different purposes:
-(1) an inside leak to WikiLeaks before Julian Assange announced on June 12, 2016, that he had DNC documents and planned to publish them (which he did on July 22) – the presumed objective being to expose strong DNC bias toward the Clinton candidacy; and
-(2) a separate leak on July 5, 2016, to pre-emptively taint anything WikiLeaks might later publish by “showing” it came from a “Russian hack.”
* * *
This is our first VIPS Memorandum for you, but we have a history of letting U.S. Presidents know when we think our former intelligence colleagues have gotten something important wrong, and why. For example, our first such memorandum, a same-day commentary for President George W. Bush on Colin Powell’s U.N. speech on February 5, 2003, warned that the “unintended consequences were likely to be catastrophic,” should the U.S. attack Iraq and “justify” the war on intelligence that we retired intelligence officers could readily see as fraudulent and driven by a war agenda.
The January 6 “Intelligence Community Assessment” by “hand-picked” analysts from the FBI, CIA, and NSA seems to fit into the same agenda-driven category. It is largely based on an “assessment,” not supported by any apparent evidence, that a shadowy entity with the moniker “Guccifer 2.0” hacked the DNC on behalf of Russian intelligence and gave DNC emails to WikiLeaks.
The recent forensic findings mentioned above have put a huge dent in that assessment and cast serious doubt on the underpinnings of the extraordinarily successful campaign to blame the Russian government for hacking. The pundits and politicians who have led the charge against Russian “meddling” in the U.S. election can be expected to try to cast doubt on the forensic findings, if they ever do bubble up into the mainstream media. But the technical limitations of today’s Internet are widely understood. We are prepared to answer any substantive challenges on their merits.
You may wish to ask CIA Director Mike Pompeo what he knows about this. Our own lengthy intelligence community experience suggests that it is possible that neither former CIA Director John Brennan, nor the cyber-warriors who worked for him, have been completely candid with their new director regarding how this all went down.
HAhahahahaHahaha. Apophenia. Epiphanies. Hahahahahaha. I’m going CRAAaaaAAAAzzzYYY!. Mmmmmmbwahaahahahhaaha.
And now, you are too. But-it IS all related indeed-to politics and political policing of words themselves. Try not to get too involved in all the pattterns….But if you REALLY want to go nuts, decipher the meaning of all those letters just above this paragraph. That should keep you busy for awhile-I mean-you lard asses have nothing better to do anyways.
Well sure- looking for Stephen Paddocks hard drive and all. That will keep you busy the same way that Oswald thingy kept you busy for 60 years or so. HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHa.
Yeah- it’s in the party van.