Indisputable link between Rotary Clubs International and stalking
In Britain and the rest of the UK, the Rotary Club has a policy to stalk those who they deem to be stalkers. And this isn’t even in dispute, as here below, we see a main premise of my thesis borne out: police are at the center of most gang stalking campaigns, and that the slippery slope of breaking the law to “enforce” the law or to “investigate” has been breached.
Sep 29, 2017Hamish Brown MBE -Former Scotland Yard DIStalking the Stalker
He has been key note speaker in Houston, Texas at the conference of End Violence Against Women International and other high profile events in Europe, Hong Kong, Los Angeles and Singapore.
He is the author of the Home Office publication Stalking and other forms of harassment, an investigators guide.
Former New Scotland Yard Detective Inspector with 30 years in the Metropolitan Police London. An International Speaker touring, en route to the 2017 International Women & Law Enforcement Conference in Cairns. Presenting on the subject of stalking. An investigative and victim perspective, coupled with case histories and studies combined with and element of english humour.
One of the great ironies of combining militants, feminism (‘militant feminism’), policing, and endless dollars in a big stinky wet, sloppy trough called the DVIC is that inevitably, the dual charade of both feminism, and “good guyism” will collide and fall flat on their own premises. Only more ironic than that- to me- is that these morons and bullies with badges who stalk people online and off actually believe that they can remain hidden.
That somehow, all the vestments of authority and then, the uncouth intimidation tactics and outright illegality of their “hidden policing” aka “communitarian policing” aka “high policing” will go unnoticed by civil liberties advocates and attorney’s. Or, failing that they they can and do and will stalk, harass, defame, and even murder activists and dissenters (Google Ferguson Protesters mysterious suicides for cases that have al of these elements.)I mean, that is if they can’t otherwise obliterate them with, you know, sooper seekrit stuff like this. (Shhhhhhhh. Don’t TELL anyone).
And here we are today, with trillions of dollars in debt, the Department of Defense literally practicing “mind control” via Facebook without informed consent; MRAP’s at the local doughnut shoppe’s as reporters who document this sort of lunacy get treated like this, and the largest gulag in human history exists just a few miles away from you, in Anywhere, USA (New York state pays $168k per inmate per year, and the Prison Industrial Complex s worth $40 BILLION dollars per year, providing “jobs”). And all of that, is yours, for the low, low price of $571MILLION dollars per year- not counting the hidden costs of the NSA/DHS/FBI/CIA/ et alphabet ass data theft pipeline which costs you 72 BILLION per year.
Related Story: “The public” just begs for more money to be spent on the DVIC every year, according to the politicians whose salaries are paid to promote it. In fact, the public bags sooooo hard for it that even the Ghost of Edward Bernays is considering coming back from the dead to get in on it.
WHO knew “feminism” meant “gorilla society” led by dominant alpha males with grenade launchers in the back seat of the squad car, cuz’ journalists are so scary-and who needs a fair fight anyways when you have a bully pulpit (extra points if you can figure out the connection between females as less-than-truthful, and gorilla infanticide), women who dress little boys up like Barbies to make their globalist financiers’ “happy” while “crushing the patriarchy here at home? Oh, well, I guess we knew feminism meant THAT ahead of time.
Well- the “public” sure does get what they beg for. And apparently, the “public” is begging for more CRISIS PR! Look! Mass shooters are popping up every day! Turreriss’s and pedophiles are EVERYWHERE!
And, the Rotary Club is in a dither because they can’t decide whether or not they should keep the bows and arrows off their logos because it’s a PR risk to stand for the second amendment-and why is THAT?
Because here, standing at this unique crossroads, the conflict between crisis PR, globalist interests that finance this sort of PR (hint: they are the SAME people who birthed the DVIC upon us), policing, and then, the hidden mechanism of gang stalking all come into focus as the focal point of the question “why do people get gang stalked” and “who gets gang stalked” and “who pays for gang stalking” and “do police participate in gang stalking” and “do retired law enforcement intelligence units participate in gang stalking,” and so on.
You know- all those hard questions that the psychologists (who get paid to torture and incarcerate people) and the main stream news (who slurp down deep state propaganda quicker than you can fill a Russian oil tanker with junk news about Pizza) never seem to ask- or even know how.
So, to those who live in academic echo chambers, or pimped out DVIC dollar lined MRAP’s, have a look here at how the US Dept. of Health and Human Services just can’t promote the DVIC enough for CRISIS PR:
-The story must be told.
News that the Department of Health and Human Services is paying a prominent public relations firm to improve its messaging to reporters throws light on a murky and little-scrutinized area of the federal budget: Advertising.
Agencies in the executive branch spent about $4.4 billion on contracts for “advertising services” from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2013, $892.5 million of that in the last year, according to a study last year by the Congressional Research Service.
That’s certainly a lot of money. But it could cover everything from public service announcements that encourage people to avoid setting forest fires to the kind of image advertising undertaken by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, part of HHS. And that’s why this kind of federal spending falls into a bureaucratic black hole, the study found. Agencies don’t really have to be transparent about what they’re doing and why.
“Absent an agreed-upon definition of “advertising” or a government-wide reporting system for advertising expenses, agencies have had great discretion to budget their in-house advertising-related costs,” research service analyst Kevin R. Kosar wrote in the study, first reported by The Fiscal Times.
“The challenges of defining advertising and, therefore, advertising expenses are significant.”
The biggest spenders in fiscal 2013 were the Defense Department ($419 million); HHS ($197.4 million); the Education Department ($128.8 million); the Department of Veterans Affairs ($61.8 million) and the Transportation Department ($43 million).
But the study said there is no “government-wide definition of what constitutes advertising” and no central place where agencies are required to report advertising-related expenditures. As a result, agencies can pretty much spend what they want.
In mid-September, public relations firm Edelman sent an e-mail to a few reporters on behalf of an unnamed federal agency asking for insights on helping “refine their agency messaging.”
It asked the reporters to “keep the conversation confidential” and not to “report on anything discussed in the interview.” For participating, Edelman offered to “donate $175 to a charity on your behalf.”
A spokesman for the substance abuse and mental health agency said the Edelman contract was designed to help the agency better understand how to better serve its customers.
Technically, there are some restrictions on advertising. For example, the Department of Defense can’t use public funds to pay for advertising by a defense contractor. The government can’t advertise certain agricultural products. Treasury appropriations laws have contained prohibitions on the use of funds for the purpose of “publicity or propaganda purposes not authorized by the Congress,” the report said. Also, agencies can’t use government money to pay for advertising to lobby Congress.
Sure- who wants to be the guy who criticizes well armed bullies who are implicated in case after case after case of guys who go ballistic and kill people, or themselves- or who just put the brakes on the GNP? Just look at the glee with which these sicko’s correlate “domestic violence” with “mass shooters” who are themselves frequently reported to be timid, or gentle natured BEFORE they go ballistic.
The “link” between domestic violence and mass shooters turns out 623, 000 results. And the MSM is pushing a narrative that there is a link-but gee whizz, who knws what it might be?
So, let me tell you what it is: it is the hidden gray area policing that I outline herein, causing these homicides/suicides and more.
Any thinking person might ask “is there a link between retired LEO’s stalking alleged stalkers in the gray area of the law, and mass shootings? And the thinking person would find that Google’s results have increased since the DVIC crisis engineers jumped in bed with the Rotary policy of stalking men who have been slandered in databases without the benefit of justice.
Here Jane Myer does her DVIC best to continue just that narrative, and breathlessly runs with “the narrative.” AND manages to throw the word “conspiracy theorist” into the article in the first paragraph:
Suuure. OGS is probably a “delusional disorder.” Who can possibly refute psychologists whose paychecks are derived fro the DVIC/PIC/MIC agenda? I guess I will then. I mean-what are these cunts gonna do-stalk me? Or-shoot me in the back?
Bunch of pigs rutting after sow-pussies if you ask me, chewing through the bottom of the planks of a healthy Democracy.