Webs of associations, connections, presidents and naming names- even some torture. All of that is in a single quote from “Six Degrees of Separation: by John Guare, voicing his observation from the mouth of his character Ouisa Kitteridge:
I read somewhere that everybody on this planet is separated by only six other people. Six degrees of separation between us and everyone else on this planet. The President of the United States, a gondolier in Venice, just fill in the names. I find it extremely comforting that we’re so close. I also find it like Chinese water torture, that we’re so close because you have to find the right six people to make the right connection…
In my formative years, I watched the movie”Six Degrees of Separation” starring Will Smith, and based on the book by Guare, and have found that, in these privacy and due process raping times, our “associations” are under attack; that the NSA, DHS, FBI, Fusion Centers, and local police have literally stolen our choices of primary “rights of assembly; and association,” by data-warehousing our entire webs of relationships in the huge data bases that I chronicle here at ROGS. And they have done it for over two decades. This is what is meant by “soft force eugenics” in the online gang stalking community, and it works like this.
So, what is a “disruption” campaign and how does it affect targeted individuals?
Six Degrees of Separation had, for me, a personal connection, though our “six degrees” is no longer six: it is TWO DEGREES of separation, as the Five Eyes Nations and the NSA-FiveEyes-Israel data theft pipeline have stolen all of our information, and use it to monitor, manipulate, and “disrupt” our relationships, as we are now all connected by a single mouse click at the NSA, or GCHQ, or any of the hundreds and thousands of other “good guys monitoring human relationships” centers across the west. As Edward Snowden said- this is not merely about spying: ‘this is about intellectual property theft,’ and then guilt by association-or vindication by it.
Six Degrees also notably highlights the late era feminism of white females attempting to ’empathize’ with black men, which they simply cannot, being as they are on one hand, the un-empathetic Bernaysian mouthpieces of organized globalism, and on the other, the mistresses of the police state itself, which Guare note’s thus in an exchange between the protagonist Paul, and the white Ouisa:
Ouisa Kittredge: There is so much you don’t know. You are so smart and so stupid.
Paul: I’ll be treated with care if you take me to the police. If they don’t know you’re special, they kill you.
Ouisa Kittredge: Oh, I don’t think they kill you.
Paul: Mrs. Louisa Kittredge, I am black.
Ouisa Kittredge: I will deliver you to them with kindness and affection.
I have never been awed by status or power, nor intimidated by it, which for some, poses a problem. And, those “some, I have described elsewhere on this blog as “cowards,” and especially as RATS, nibbling away at the bottom most planks of Constitutional Democracy, and nibbling away at the bottom of the bottomless DVIC slop-trough. And as such, I have come to realize how the Pharisee’s and the scumbags alike all HATE words. And, mine, specifically and especially.
But fame and power interested me slightly in my formative years, for several reasons, not least of which is that when I was kid, I spent a lot of time on Hollywood Blvd, in Hollywood, CA, where Smith used to hang out as well, during his pre- “Fresh Prince of Bel Aire” days.
Generally, he caused quite a stir when he would roll up to Tommy’s, in his late model Benz ( I actually cannot remember what his car was, but I recall that he preferred late model Benzies or something similar) or otherwise show up at a club venue with a gorgeous ingenue strapped to his arm. Those who hung out, or lived on The Blvd-those ranged from teen runaways, to hookers and dope dealers, or punk rockers who squatted on abandoned properties up on Mount Olympus- would stir like bees, and in minutes, everyone knew that Smith was around.
He was an “up and coming star” then, and everyone wanted to touch fame, and hope it rubbed off. Except me. I was saving up to pay my way through college when I met a “mind controlled”system child named “Piper.”
I personally was never star struck in any way, and have the unique ability to see people as people, regardless of stature. And I always somehow had a focus on the fact that fame is illusory, and that it can get in the way of other things that are more important. And in Hollywood, in that era, a lot was plainly “not right,” but also, not necessarily wrong either; that things were as they have been for millenia; and even moreso, that I was called to write, which is a tenuous fate for anyone facing “the way tings really are.”
Many years later, as a budding journalist, I tried to “make a difference,” by writing stories that defied “narrative” and that defied those who abuse power, and sought the gritty “facts” instead-and was soundly abused because of it by those that I write about herein and more, all of whom had their own designs on what I could or should do, what I could or should write.
SO when the researcher asks the question “who are targeted individuals?” Who gets gang stalked?” and so on, a simple answer would be that those who defy the lockup on narrative are primary targets, because narrative is the guiding force of corruption; and corruption is profitable; and the truth? Well….you can’t handle the truth.
But the truth is, in a society where Jewish-christians and then, al of their many sects and cults have a lockup on narrative, and where the mouth-piece of choice is the white female and her “others,” who literally CREATE boogiemen like evil Golem’s-those of us who see it another way are plainly dangerous to their old myths and lies, and cover-ups of atrocity after atrocity with their pseudo-morality, called “religion,” which many of our societies most astute have observed is a form of mental illness-but because so many suffer from it, it is the “norm” not the exception.
And so, the irony of me scrabbling around at the feet of Hollywood then was less than ironic, because I couldn’t give a rat’s ass about fame, or power; but “they” did, all of them. Sherman, the script writer, living in his cat-shit littered apartment, and cranking out pulpy manuscripts and cat-pawed screenplays; Henry Rollins playing here or there, the Sick Green Hearts and their heroin addiction (as I recall they were usually too sick to get out of bed and play), and Bukowski’s bungalow blocks away-none of it meant “doodley squat” to me, then or now, as I simply couldn’t write an “ending” to any story I ever attempted- there are just too many new beginnings that the end is plainly outgunned.
Anyways- years later, as a budding college journalist ( I studied journalism because the paragraphs were moronically simple, and most American’s are adept at moronically simple), who worked in a little college news office, at a college that, it turns out, was and still is one of the FBI’s “Somali/immigrant informant recruiting” centers, I once interviewed Lynne Stewart, who passed away in March of this year, 2017.
Stewart was labeled “the Terrorists Lawyer,” by the Bush Administration, because she had the odd trait of being able to represent clients according to the law-every ugly and precious bit of it, and to protect her clients, and to protect due process, and civil liberty zealously, with vigor, and regardless of their politics, or the political climate in which she practiced law. And in a social climate where practicing law and defending clients is demonized by the police, and their racist enablers, even lawyers ‘get no respect.’ especially those who stand for the CONSTITUTION.
But American cops no longer stand for the constitution, and have nearly al never even read it, because they themselves are little more than the paid armies of AIPAC and its enablers.
Cops who hate America give policing a bad name. Here is a “police opinion” of Lynne Stewart, from Michelle Malkin, who has likely chowed down a few sloppy cops dogs in her time. So many in fact that it is surprising that she can even speak freely:
Well, sue, Stewart represented radical leftists, gangster’s and mass murderers, and non-Jewish Nazi’s alike; she represented “the Blind Sheik,” Omar Abdel Rahman, who was an actual terrorist, as opposed to these manufactured terrorists that we see being created today-and Rahman also died this year in Supermax prison, almost as a signal that we are at the end of an era-and no one seems to know it.
But what she was DEFENDING was due process and the Constitution, which is distinctly different than “defending terrorists.” And who could forget that King George thought the founding fathers were themselves terrorists?!
And, of course, she represented FBI star witness against organized crime, Sammy “the Bull” Gravano, who gets out of prison today. Gravano was an actual RAT who brought down the Gambino crime family, and John Gotti (at least- the parts of this crime family that are NOT on the FBI payroll, or otherwise working with and for the government.)
Like cancer, rats chew away at self-sustaining organisms, and then, let larger diseases in. Don’t get me wrong- mobsters are plainly dangerous, and plainly scary and all that, and Gravano made “hard choices” but this new thing- this ‘thing of theirs’? This government with no due process ever, and constant slander and spying and the destruction of due process in “gray area” that will NEVER see a day in court (and which they work hard to keep OUT of courts? It’s terrifying in every way.
Some might note in my thesis here, that our current corroded democracy was initiated by secret courts and secret laws, and secret practices in the “gray area” of policing and prosecutor conduct and misconduct. Gravano’s case was one of those that set this trend.
And, too, a cowardly trend was set in journalism as well, by the “nation’s opinion leader” The New York Times. Here is the schmear that the New Yarwk Times put out about Ms. Stewart as an obituary– and I have highlighted the keywords and phrases that indicate a smear-in fact, the entire first paragraph is classic intelligence agency slander:
Lynne F. Stewart, a radical-leftist lawyer who gained wide notice for representing violent, self-described revolutionaries and who spent four years in prison herself, convicted of aiding terrorism, died on Tuesday at her home in Brooklyn. She was 77.
Her son, Geoffrey Stewart, said the cause was complications of cancer and a series of strokes.
Ms. Stewart, who had been treated for breast cancer before entering prison, was granted a “compassionate release” in January 2014 after the cancer had spread and was deemed terminal. Doctors at the time gave her 18 months to live.
A former librarian and teacher, she had taken up the law in the cause of social justice after seeing the squalor in the area around the public school in Harlem where she taught. She built a reputation for representing the poor and the reviled, usually for modest, court-paid fees.
Believing that the American political and capitalist system needed “radical surgery,” as Ms. Stewart put it, she sympathized with clients who sought to fight that system, even with violence, although she did not always endorse their tactics, she said.
One such client was Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, the blind Egyptian cleric who was found guilty in 1995 of leading a plot to blow up New York City landmarks, including the United Nations, after some of his followers had driven a powerful bomb into a garage beneath the World Trade Center in 1993, killing six people. Ms. Stewart would visit him in prison, where he was serving a life sentence in solitary confinement. Her death came less than three weeks after his: He died in prison on Feb. 18.
So, when I met her, and covered her story in a little college newspaper that had been ransacked several times (most likely by the college administrator) Stewart was touring the nation under federal indictment, working with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and others; and I was being followed around and photographed by cowardly “mystery people” who ranged from tall Ethiopian men in suits, to flat chested blonde women and butch haircuts, or stocky meat-packer shouldered black women with bad weaves- and all of them with bad shoes (usually black, but sometimes “Eddie Bauer brown”).
And I was “crazy” because my relationships were undermined-James became an FBI informant; Laura became a librarian-much like Lynne Stewart herself had been a librarian-and another story I covered about a “terrorist” who was a librarian- librarians are highly targeted individuals, apparently. Let me know if you start seeing patterns, because…
My phone’s were constantly re-routed and redirected-even when I was in foreign lands. There was the “clicking” at the switch-fairly routine surveillance; but, too, the morons who repeated select words and phrases back to me over time. And much more going on as you might imagine; and much of that terrifying and heinous in ways that only deviants at the state level could think up, and disgusting; abhorrent to due process of law.
Many years after the time I interviewed her, my storage locker was broken into. My family mementos box was tossed like a salad, and my papers were scattered between boxes. So my “news clippings” were mixed with “family history” and my book and leaflet collections- the contents of several boxes of distinctly different materials literally became “word salad.”
And, my reporters notebooks had pages torn out of them, and these pages were put int different boxes or otherwise scattered about. Here are the notes these people came to take-and never a single warrant issued to me, or left anywhere. And this happened some five years AFTER I had interviewed and AFTER she was convicted of ‘material support for terrorism” because she did what?
She spoke with a cnvicts family on the phone. Yup. She got ten years for that.
Are you seeing any patterns yet especially patterns about how long they drag these “disruption campaigns” out- and how petty and trifling the ‘offenses’ are? Surely, America is under attack from SOMEONE SOMEWHERE- but it isn’t terrorists, because last I checked, terrorists LOVE speech.
How about this pattern: shortly after I discovered this burglary of my storage locker- which I did not report to police for obvious reasons stated all over this blog- shortly afterwards, “mysterious” pele contacted me on a web forum that has since disappeared from the internet-and thee mystery people were yammering on about how “yeah, THEY can even do sneak and peek searches of your stuff,” and so on.
So, here is evidence of my personal disruption campaign- because I believe in due process of law, and the right-indeed, the IMPERATIVE NECESSITY of attorney’s to vigorously defend their clients:
Look at these notes above ad ask yourself what could POSSIBLY be worth anything to anyone? If your answer was that I was personally villified, terrorized, and sufficiently in horror that I virtually kept quiet for many years, you would be correct- because the outrageous state of affairs of gray area policing, and Kafaka-meets-Orwell-meets-Fabian in the DVIC policing scheme that this country and the west is in today are beyond imagination of the founders, and even beyond the imagination of LEFTISTS of Stewart’s ERA!
So, for those peeking in, and asking yourselves “what is a targeted individual” or “what happens in gang stalking,” know this: I refused to cooperate, capitulate, cop a plea, or otherwise subsume “my” rights to those who approached me in secret, in “darkness” or who used un-Constitutional and undue processes and methods to ensnare or enlist my “support,” or submission.
In other words, in totally corrupted societies, they never come “through the straight gate,” and choose cowardly,ensnaring, entrapping, or blackmailing work-arounds instead. This is what gray area policing, aka Fabian Socialism is meeting the total corruption of institutional power; and all of that WITHOUT JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT, or with judicial complicity.
So there’s that factor, and becoming a rat, like Sammy the Bull. It only takes one rat gnawing away at the bottom of the big huge sloppy pig trough to set a trend. And, as we see with our total surveillance state, DVIC dollars are the Pied Piper that these have followed-and led us over the cliff of this new “thing of theirs”-totalitarianism.