In my thesis, one can easily pick out some patterns that no doubt apply to many people, across the socio-economic spectrum, ranging from well established journalists, to the dangerous, and infamous gangster babies of the CalGang database, to drug users, to middle class aspirants as common as electricians; ranging from al-leftists to alRightists; Jews to christians.
In other words, OGS isn’t some imaginary thing that afflicts random “crazy people” or people with ‘advanced sequelae of mental illness’ as Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, David V. James, and others such as Christine Sarteschi, from PA, where a civil rights lawyer who took on the Penn state pedophiles, and the former head of the DHS itself, Tom Ridge was gang stalked by DVIC black operations, would have you believe.
Sarteschi, Sheridan and James are the current opinion leaders of gang stalking denialism, running cover for the 24/7 surveillance state, and its parasitic DVIC companions in Fusion Centers that are in fact and practice monitoring the communications and political associations of targeted activists, dissidents, and influential Americans.
Here, we see Dr. Christine Sarteschi and David V.James running disinformation in Canada, as reported by the CBC, as Sarteschi claims -without evidence -that she has never seen a, “real ” case if OGS, despite ample evidence to the contrary world wide.
Instead, OGS is a verifiable assault on civil liberty, and constitutional democracy at every core level that targets individuals, frequently targeting “key constituents” or “influencers” in key dialogues or dialectics.
In fact, the NSA/FBI/CIA/DHS/DEA/Israel/to Fusion Centers etc data theft pipeline has enabled a new form of oppression that has the ability to target people in ways that were little moe than intelligence agency fantasies previous to the internet; and the means and methods- and the scope-the likes of which the world has never seen, are plainly hard to imagine, because the internet is frequently used in fact and in practice literally as a mind control venue, and a full time influence operation.
Related Story: Bill McGaughey has run for many political offices, as an independent candidate, i.e.~ AIPAC and other racist, sectarian zionist organizations, Soros/Koch sponsored NGOs, and the deep state HATE independents who cannot be corrupted or purchased-or blackmailed.
OGS strikes the core of identity, and structure, selectively targeting individuals in various ways. In the case of Bill McGaughey of Minneapolis Minnesota, he wrote the manual on ” Landlord Advocate,” in Minneapolis, for which he was resoundingly punished with police practices that had long been targeted almost exclusively at young black, or Hispanic kids, sometimes at white trailer trash, and occasionally at Asians, or other immigrants. And not surprisingly, community policing was a factor.
For context: Kill My Landlord, by Eddie Murphy on Saturday Night Live
Dark and lonely on the summer night.
Kill my landlord, kill my landlord.
Watchdog barking – Do he bite?
Kill my landlord, kill my landlord.
Slip in his window,
Break his neck!
Then his house
I start to wreck!
Got no reason —
What the heck!
Kill my landlord, kill my landlord.
My land – lord …
And then, Kill My Landlord, by The Coup
Lastly, the murder-by-defamation of Bill McGaughey in DVIC paperwork: framing a narrative of “bad men and good women”
So, when you add into this massive data-basing of “human-computer-interface” we see that the real world effects are in fact, applied selectively-for now- and targeted individuals are frequently just the experimental portion of that. TI’s are the “first they came for my landlord, and I said nothing, because I wasn’t a landlord” aspect of Hegelian policing.
But how to prove such a wide ranging thesis? How to document that such IS TRUE, or COULD BE TRUE?
And the short form answer to that is this: the past, is the present is the future, but NOW with the “augmented reality” of the internet interfacing with every person questions, problems, joyful Youtube watching; the sending of a new infants picture through email- all of this is intermediated by “middle men,”and women who are never seen, never held accountable; and all of whom are acting as “God” when they participate in OGS.
So, in order to see how the past has dealt with “organizing” gang stalking of individuals, it helps to have some data, and a name or two as a starting point. Then, let’s take a look at how data interacts at the switch, and the interplay between “internet” and real life.
I will examine the case of Bill McGaughey, of Minneapolis Minnesota as a point of convergence between old fashioned, pre-internet era practices, and the post-internet reality of highly organized, meta-organized, gang stalking. I use this case for several reasons:
- his case came to a head after an 11 year period-and the term gang stalking was growing in use online as the internet itself matured, as did OGS tactics.
- his case fits a classic OGS scenario of state and federal initiatives of the Domestic Violence Industrial Complex interacting with human relationships, with real estate, and control of a woma as an asset, and as and end goal.
- His case describes OGS to the letter, as experienced by Bob Deis, James McClynas, and Jeff Pataky, and any more, and also as described to me by a source whose theory can be seen here.
- Real estate, false or one sided claims of domestic violence, official slander, libel and defamation, possible links with foreign intelligence, one-sided policing, a link to Virginia (CIA HQ) and more figure in, much as we seen across the board with OGS cases.
- I corresponded with McGaughey for awhile, and while he did not feel that his own situation was “gang stalking” he also did not want any more publicity, hoping his troubles would go just away.
- In the online dialectic of OGS, any researcher will find that men who have foreign wives are highly targeted (especially in military OGS).
- many forms f coercive custody and control, despite innocence of any crime. As OGS online is largely an influence operation, there are also factors of direct mind control involved, not least of which is causing targets to “trigger,” which is well known in the community
As usual, I ask you, the reader, to question everything I say, and to cross check or cross validate it with other evidence, or to dismiss what I say outright if you are so predisposed.
McGaughey’s story, which you can purchase online for Kindle, begins thus:
After eleven years of marriage, my wife and I had been discussing divorce. Either we could agree to an amicable settlement or fight it out in the courts. My wife was fishing for financial information to use against me. I was still trying to decide if we should have a divorce.
Matters came to a head on Friday, February 18, 2011. This was three days before my 70th birthday. My wife Rose (not her real name), born and raised in China, was 54 years of age. She was in the process of mailing packages of books to her daughter who lives in northern Virginia. My wife and I lived in adjoining units on the second floor of a four-plex located in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
It begins with a few of my favorite thesis points, doesn’t it? A DVIC scenario, real estate, a foreign bride, and Virginia, a state where the CIA head quarters sits pleasantly Farming out “self sustaining” operations. And of course- of course!- lop-sided story telling, aka narrative control.
But let’s have McGaughey tell it:
There was a knock on the front door….two Minneapolis police officers let themselves into the house. One was a white-male officer and the other was an Asian female, most likely Hmong…. I expected to have a rational conversation about the incident with the police.
Immediately after I had closed the door, the white-male police officer standing in back of me ordered me to face the door and put my hands behind my back. He slipped handcuffs on my wrists. Then the female officer led me down the steps to the squad car parked in front of the house. I said nothing and the officers asked me no questions. I thought there might still be bite marks on the back of my wrist that I could use to explain what happened.
My arms were held tightly behind my back. The female officer turned on a computer and asked me a set of routine questions. I asked if she would take a look at the bite marks on the back of my hand. She said she would in a few minutes but never did. The handcuffs were squeezing my wrists so hard that I felt a loss of circulation. When I pointed this out to the female officer, she loosened the handcuffs and the circulation began to return. During that time, she asked me no questions. Neither did she look at the bite marks that I had mentioned.
At length, the male police officer returned to the car. He read me my “Miranda rights”.
So: “no touch torture,” coercive control, one sided story telling, and of course- “progressives!” Then, when you read through his story, other details emerge, such as how many “make work” projects overlap each other, and how the shakedown racket is state actions, much like “asset forfeiture” (which becomes a threat in his story too.)
So, he’s “booked in,” and th usual pleasantries are exchanged between inmates, and then, suggestions of suicide, which are standard OP in all jails:
I was then taken to a desk where an Asian woman asked questions pertaining to my mental health. Did I have suicidal thoughts? Did I think people were out to get me? That was the tenor of her questioning. I answered “no” to all such questions. At the end of the interview, I expressed the opinion that I was in jail because of “manufactured” charges. With surprising candor, the woman remarked that this sometimes happens.
The story itself reads like a fairly typical DVIC initiation, where a man is being accused, and then policed, and then railroaded though “gray area policing” at all levels, and at all times is seen as guilty, with the need to prove his innocence, or cop a plea.
And all of THAT includes that should e speak up, he could face “enhanced measures” that all but solidify a verdict already delivered-BECAUSE the gray area policing has been invoked in the first place; as if the right to a trial is itself a threat, and the pre-punishment is gray area schemes of asset forfeiture and more, such as “parking tickets”.
And it cannot be missed that the underlying threat feared and faced by McGaughey is “homelessness” Here, again, one of the themes of OGS itself:
The down side of guilty pleas was that the offenses were “enhanceable”. In other words, if a particular offense was repeated, the punishment would be more severe. Misdemeanors would become felonies if the same conduct happened three times. I had been charged with a misdemeanor and was determined not to plead guilty to any charge.
There was also a young man named Zubay. The victim had said that she was willing to drop the charges. She wanted to remove the “no contact” order. Zubay claimed that he had not physically assaulted this person. However, the police report said that he had tried to smother her. Judge Wernick glanced at the police report and decided that the “no contact” order should continue.
The judge heard at least twenty cases that day. Having parked in a two-hour zone on the street, I was worried that Joe’s car might be ticketed. Joe was less concerned. We listened to a case where a man had violated an order for protection. If I heard the judge correctly, he was saying that violations of court orders such as those for no contact with the alleged victims would be charged as felonies regardless of the original offense.
Despite his courteous demeanor, Judge Wernick struck me as a martinet who was unconcerned with people’s real-life needs. Chief among his callous proclivities, I imagined, was the judge’s fondness for making defendants suddenly homeless in the dead of winter.
At this point, I would like to note that his case took place in 2011 and forwards, where several things were happening in policing, in politics, in reall estate, and in banking. All of this can be researched by others, but simply put: McGaughey is an “old white man” who is the arch enemy of “progressives” nationally, but particularly in the state of Minnesota.And in such cultural environments, this OWM is a target (just look at who the targets were in the McClynas, Pataky, and many other cases where real estate, and the DVIC with gray area policing is a primary feature.)
So, part of the progressive narrative is the “re-distribution of wealth,” and also, in the Hegelian dialectic, the confrontation between the old power and the new power, which McGaughey states and restates many times in different ways.
Lastly, complaints of OGS are dramatically just after each election of Barak Obama, whose platform is well known: he is a child of the CIA and also, of the DVIC itself, and all of the “progressive” rhetoric of the preceding era’s. So, this case of OS is the cream on top of the DVIC cake- taking property from “old white men,” in gray area policing.
Again- go over to his site, buy his book, or whatever, but especially note how this nightmare ends up: with multiple court dates, jail payments, coercive custody and control, one sided story telling, soft force torture- and especially, state agencies, and agents deriving income from gray area policing in a grand “make work project”with a civil asset forfeiture threat, and the state sitting poised to pounce on the property to boot.
Four days later, a green Day-Glo sheet was posted on the front door of my house which read: “NOTICE In accordance with Chapter 244, Section 244.1450 and 244.1470 and/or Chapter 249 of the Housing Maintenance Code of the City of Minneapolis, the premises, building and structure hereon located at 1702 Glenwood Ave. N. are hereby declared unfit for human habitation and dangerous to life and health because of: LACK OF MAINTENANCE. You as owner are hereby ordered to abate the conditions above cited by 10-APR-2011. Failure to bring the building into compliance will result in the building being condemned.”
Minneapolis is a huge gang stalking city, in a hugely targeted state, and all of this has the distinct odor of “feminist jurisprudence,” and the DVIC. One of the main platforms of that state’s particular OGS is discriminatory code enforcement, and the associated state/city/ federally funded initiatives of social control though property control.
Related Story: How the DVIC is a huge make work project, and the “Dworkin Prophecy” come true.
In fact, many reports of OGS from Minnesota claim that sex offenders are used to coerce property owners; or that the “women’s advocates” use female sex offenders and prostitutes to stalk/entrap/inform, and even that they use fakerape complaints to leverage men. such is the nature of the well heeled Minnesota gray area policing scheme (the state takes in some 65 BILLION DOLLARS per year from federal initiatives that leverage people out of house and home, and create dependency; while their governor- Mark Dayton- can barely speak a single clear sentence because he’s all hopped up on Big Pharma dope all the time).
So, here below, again- note the names of all the female judges and advocates, as we teeter between watching one man’s life existentially threatened, leveraged, and possibly foreclosed, until:
“ Dear Mr. McGaughey:
I am dismissing the above entitled charges (domestic assault) against you. Enclosed is a copy of the notice of dismissal to the court that will be filed on March 19, 2012. I have also informed the judge that I am dismissing the case. There is no need for you to appear in court on March 26, 2012, as the trial will be cancelled upon my dismissal.
Jennifer A. Saunders
Assistant Minneapolis City Attorney
Ah, but it’s not over until the fat lady sings! Because in gray area policing, “not guilty” also means “not innocent.” See how that works- and how neatly feminist jurisprudence manages to escape jury trials-where guilt or innocence can be decided, by LAW instead of by gray area he-said/she said? Niiiice.
Therefore, those charges were also dismissed. Yet, here was a Divorce Court judge continuing to treat me as if I might be guilty of Domestic Abuse even though my innocence had legally been established. Or had it been, really?
In gray area policing, one never knows “for sure” if a man is guilty. Niiiiice how that works-and how it keeps the DVIC happy, and fat-very fat. While one cannot prove innocence under the DVIC and feminist jurisprudence, or especially in a total surveillance state- we can prove that “they” are all snout deep in it, and cewing out the bottom of the rough-that’s one thing we can prove, with evidence.