Trigger Warning: for those who have been abused with mind control that includes worms, bugs, or parasites, this post contains a video of a worm in a crickets head, causing it to commit suicide
John Forbes Nash, was not schizophrenic: a case study on the effects of bullying, and then OGS bullying-v-organic disorder
John Nash, one of the great coup’de grace of psychology in the last century, died in 2015, about the time that myself and others began to discuss and write about the likely fact that he was NOT a schizophrenic in any sense of the word.
And, he died in a car accident just that year-within months of me writing that exact thought. And perhaps I weighted my evaluation of hs case as one of the great psychology frauds of the last century, in part, because his biographer Sylvia Nasar is the daughter of a CIA agent who emigrated to the US at the beginning of Operation Paperclip, and during McGill Universities MKULTRA experiments.
So, I’m biased, maybe, because it seems that everywhere you look, the literature, and the “psychology” of these era’s is laced with CIA authors, and “information”-aka “intelligence,” but also, religious cultural bias, which infects every opinion, and every psychological diagnoses, many of which are weaponized.
From JD Salinger,to many others, we see the sectarian biases creeping into culture, warring with each other through authors, with sooper seekrit agencies mediating culture by acting as hidden interlocutors in the middle of every literary narrative.
Meanwhile, Americas racist -sectarian -religious wars are waged in classrooms, as the toxic ADL sponsors both school curriculum, AND the Israelification of American police, via privately spinsored bribes and “training ”in Israel.
Salingers work,Catcher in the Rye, which is pushed in many American classrooms today as “great literature,” eminates from the half Jewish, half other cultural framework, and was heralded for decades and several well known assassins carried that book when they committed crimes.
In fact, Catcher just came out as another re-incarnation/reaffirmation that the sheeple are still in the pen, in the form of a movie, in this modern era of gang stalking, and mass shooter creation.
Salinger was also the author of many quasi pedophilic works (Bananfish) and so, what has been widely called the the progenitor of the mass shooter, ala Holden Caulfield, is still used as a form of quintessential CIA based propaganda, even getting a remake this year with Rebel in the Rye.
Then, other literature, ranging from such classics as One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest (which I wrote about in the case study of Lucie), to the more recent recruiting tool aimed at white mid-life crisis aged females, Zero Dark Thirty-something, to the interesting but totally flawed depiction of Nash in A Beautiful Mind- the CIA’s prints are all over the place in American literature.
But speaking of Fabian Socialism, international banking, and time theft as unconstitutional policing methods take Dworin -sized bites out of due process, -have a look at the question that ‘psychology’ is STILL asking today-I mean- you would think “they” would have answers by now, right? Or- is there something ‘more?’
And try not to see any patterns, cuz‘….
The Parasite in the Crickets Head Which Causes It to Commit Suicide
Pop science, unlike pop psychology, is based in actual science. Here, from Popsci.com, you can read more about the actual science that demonstrates how the cricket is killed via direct parasitism the result of a neuro-parasitic infection by the worm; but not really BY the worm, but rather OF the worm-the worm itself is the infection. And a similar case can be made by indicating that psychological processes are also invaded by intelligence collection via the internet, and other forms of ‘infiltration and infection’ of the actual person who becomes involved in organized gang stalking, aka intelligence and counter-intelligence surveillance.
Unlike psychology, in “hard sciences” there is actual footage, actual species involved, and actual video of the cause/effect relationship between the cricket’s suicide and the parasitic worm crawling out of its head, as well as metrics that can measure this relationship directly. For example, a cricket with a horsehair worm in its head will inevitably commit suicide, versus a cricket without a horsehair worm in its head will NOT commit suicide.
In other words, the cricket, once invaded by the worm, will nearly always commit suicide, which is a nearly 100% predictable, replicable feature of this neuro-parasitic invasion. This is what is called “proof” in scientific circles.
The worm is neocon -progressive religionists, infecting every law, and policy, while hiding their presence in the cowardly terminoligy of “saving women and children,”aka “white slavery.”
Unlike science, however, psychology does not have the ability to prove or disprove anything with certainty, and although courts allow psychological testiony as nearly as if it is scientific proof or prediction of one thing or another (and it is not), there simply is no actual proof in most psychology- until we come to the point of torture, or other uses of psychology as a ‘predictor’ of ‘scientific’ outcomes, where we find a shift in standards of ‘proof,’ where psychology takes on a cultish, and nearly religiously vested mantle as something close to religious belief that overlooks, denies, claims igorance, or otherwise “gas-lights” a patients complaints for political expediency, much as we see with the Sheridan and James study, or the Dietrich thesis, both of which are in opposition to the lived experience of Dr. Moss David Posner, who was not only a targeted individual advocate, but also a draft resistor against the total lock-up on narrative of the Military Industrial Complex and its propaganda organs.
So, we must now look at psychology itself as a near-religion, at times directly opposed to science, or in thhe least exsting un-accredited next to it; and also question the political purposes of psychology from a Bernaysian perspective of “pop psy” versus “pop sci”; and as a pseudo science that is literally opposed to science, but partial to being used as a near religion.
Here- have a look at that in the form of the CIA torture psychologists Mitchell and Jessen-both of whom are Mormons. Then, saunter down Sigmund Freud and Edward Bernays lane, where we see propaganda and science literally blurred in true Marxist fashion, with an undertone of utility for certain billionaires and war financiers versus other billionaires and war financiers.
So, here is a snippet from the linked article from the pop psycholology magazine PsychologyToday.com above asking “what did John Forbes Nash REALLY have?” (which is the psychology equivalent of asking who the real killer was in the case of OJ Simpson):
It is a commonplace that John Nash, the Nobel-Prize winning mathematician and economist who recently died, had “schizophrenia.” All his obituaries repeat the formula, and the assumption of the book about his life and the subsequent movie, “A Beautiful Mind,” leave this assumption unchallenged.
But did he really have schizophrenia?
Core schizophrenia begins in adolescence or early adulthood, may involve a psychotic break, certainly involves diminished executive function, affective blunting and a thought disorder. (On this see Edward Shorter, What Psychiatry Left Out Routledge.) The concept of “thought disorder” means inability to think clearly, or in a consecutive manner. It does not necessarily mean the hallucinations and delusions of psychosis.
Related Story: The Guardian implores “don’t use Nash case to sell drugs.”
So, psychology “Today” is asking a question about a dead man, and then, querying data about incidents and interpretations of those incidents from over 65 years ago. Does that indicate to you, the reader, a potential “problem” with psychology-and psychologists? If it doesn’t, then, please-by all means, stuff your head back in Uranus, which, like your opinion, might need more analyses .
But to understand this claim, that Nash WAS NOT SHCIZOPHRENIC, we must go back in time and study the entire century, which is literally impossible in ordinary terms, and up until the ‘invention’ of today’s mind control apparatus, which you are beginning to discover-or already know-is the internet, we could not possibly imagine what someone is “thinking” at any given moment, and then, understand what that individual is “thinking about” or are planning. And certainly, the big boogieman of the “terrorist” has given corporations and governments their reason de etre’ for chronic surveillance.
But the reality is now as it was in Nash’s time: intelligence itself is the TARGET, and the intelligent themselves are “targeted individuals.“And this is a fact, correlated across online platforms, and across the entire dialectic: like a parasitic worm that moles into the head of a cricket and then controls or benefits from that crickets actions, such is the condition of many TI’s and the intelligence agencies.
For most of the last century, psychologies big secret was that it really is Jewish mind control. designed to control or contain, manipulate or profit from innovations in order to benefit “the Jews.” While this is a controversial claim, and some might also infer that it is “anti-semitic” one must only look at the people who make claims of anti-semitism to realize that they themselves are rabid racists, and genocidal psychopaths.
Then, ask the questions that feww seem willing to adk: whyre so very many of thos implicated in spying and data theft councidentally from these desert tribes? Mark Zuckerberg and Facebooj, Karp and Palantir, and mysterious Israelis cropping up in every hacking event, including the Apple Iphone encryption debate?
So, for atheists, and the secular, this is an unavoidable paradox: psychopaths who willingly have subverted our rights of fredom of speech, assembly, and association, in online and offline mobbings, so many of which trace directly to Israel via the NSA~FVEY~Israel unfiltered data collection at the internet switch.
it also must be noted that the wider christian culture finds utility in the net products of Jewish psychopathology, and so, together, Jewish-christian societies have largely conquered the ‘world.’ And we must ask ourselves repeatedly “who is the cricket and who is the worm” one century to the next, because all western religion derives from Abrahamic supremacist narratives.
Related Reading: Shepherds and Sheeple; or ‘how to lead the blind’ from the perspective of OGS
So here below is a short tour in the form of a link farm, of the two men who took on the formidable and profitable(and self appointed) task of mind control of “the masses” in the last generation, Sigmund Freud and Edward Bernay’s. It cannot be missed that both men were related, that they were Jewish; and that the Nazi’s kept copies of their books in their offices.
Also, much like the current crop of torture and mind control psychologists who derive massive profits from their unconscionable work, each attempted to distance themselves from the use of their ideas in Nazi-ism, much as we see the CIAs current torture doctors Mitchell and Jessen excusing their role in torture.
They were using my books as the basis for a destructive campaign against the Jews of Germany. This shocked me, but I knew any human activity can be used for social purposes or misused for antisocial ones.
Edward Bernay’s, on his role in the Holocaust, and other atrocities
Crowd psychology, aka “mob psychology” and organized gang stalking
Sub-categories of the manipulation of the masses:
- 3.2 Freudian theory
- 3.3 Deindividuation theory
- 3.4 Convergence theory
- 3.5 Emergent norm theory
- 3.6 Social identity theory
With this background above, I will analyze a few of the concepts and practices that affect both individuals, and also to examine narcissism fro the viewpoint tat most media is Jewish controlled media,that puts itself as queen Esther at the gate keeping mechanism in EVERY important discussion in ALL media, and that some versions of Jews zealously guard this monopoly; but also that the “intelligence” aspect of today’s current scheme of NSA-Israel data theft, aka “mass surveillance” is more than passive collection.
Then, I will “single out” John Nash as a perfect victim of hidden abuse and gas lighting, and a perfect target of intelligence agency abuse. And, extra points if you ask-but what about Nashs wife, a foreign bride?
so, because the entire western narrative descends from Talmudic and Torah stories, and those stories shared, or coopted by the warrior and servant class of christians, this form of a mental disordered narration of events taints every single story, by design of the worm, and the cricket.
And so Nash, who won the Nobel Peace prize for the Game Theory that controls much of the world today, and which the CIA and many publuc and private intelligence actors use to manipulate outcomes (and that Nobel prize itself given to those who perpetuate endlessJewish-christian war) we will see that it is at least MORE likely than LESS likely that Nash was a targeted individual, targeted by both Jewish AND dominionist elements of the intelligence community.
So, every idea is interceded, and its efects negotiated, mitigated, or otherwise intercepted at the internet switch, much like John Nashs shed full of notes. And, the intercession of those who seek to replicate, and profit from Jewish-christian culture.