Gang stalking and proof: proof costs money-who can compete with Goldman Sacks, or George Soros, or government stalkers deep pockets?

Who finances organized gang stalking, proof, George Soros, Goldman Sacks, Government Stalking.

“Who finances gang stalking?”

What’s the difference between 3 million and 4 billion dollars anyways? Decorated intelligence officer William Binney  built a machine to monitor the communications of foreign targets for just over 3 million. Then, he became a whistle blower when the NSA and the FBI targeted and harassed him– and they used “their machine” instead, which cost 4 BILLION dollars, and entraps the communications of EVERY AMERICAN.

Their version of the great terrorist/badguy/activist/journalist/whistleblower/pedophile  catcher machine (The TBAJWPCM72) costs the taxpayer between 52 and 72 billion dollars per year. And YOU pay for organized gang stalking every time you vote for security over liberty; your own silence over speaking up. And that isn’t counting the lawsuits that occur as a direct result of this “small town terrorism.”

Because of the hidden, well orchestrated and well financed occult (meaning hidden, and in this case, black budget) nature of organized gang stalking, proof is very hard to find in the narratives of those who claim they are stalked. However, as you read through this blog you will see several well documented incidents of systematic, organized harassment, and few of the people who report this are crazy, or mentally ill in the sense of organic mental illness.

What the victims of OGS are, often times, is under extreme stress, and duress, and sometimes under a form of psychosis that has been described in psychology, but not specifically in relation to tareted individuals, until we see that psychology is complicit in cases such as Martha Mitchell, and Jean Seberg, and maybe even your neighborhood “delusional person.”. And no doubt many Targeted Individuals do have pre-existing or recent onset symptoms of mental illness, and those who victimize them are frequently the cause of it.

What must be considered is a mental health related question of “who finances gang stalking?” This question routinely comes up in many blogs and video’s, but until recently, few of the bloggers attempted to answer this question. So, what must be considered is the proven cases of gang stalking that I have written about so far. Other researchers can find other proofs, and balance claims of OGS against what is extant, but here below arjust a e a few I have covered up to now.

Stockton city manager Bob Deis had the well heeled police/fire union move in next door to him and wage an endless campaign of noise terror, and more. This was financed by tax paying citizens, who can’t seem to find real work anywhere, while literal domestic terror is waged by public sectr employees to protect their double and riple police and fire pension funds. The situation was so absurd that they even bought the house next to Deis to pad their portfolio. Meanwhile, like many cities across America that are being bilked in the “see something say something” make work scheme’s of these public servants, Stockton was then, and is now, totally broke and in massive debt. Bob Deis lost his job.

Anti-corruption blogger Jeff Pataky had nearly an entire police department ruin his life, and it was financed by local, state and federal taxes paid by citizens. And if I recall, he was caught up in a domestic dispute with his wife who later dated or got “extremely close to” one of her heroic saviors from the police department, which is a common theme in many of these cases.Makes one wonder- if you have nothing to hide, then….

And in these two cases alone, we see a pattern emerge which I will flesh out later, bt it appears that a mercenary element within police and public unions and institutions is blatantly abusing their power, and benefiting financially.

For example, when Rick Krlich and his wife Cindy bought a house in Hubbard Ohio, and the local police overlooked and even participated in what amounts to a ten year harassment campaign similar to the year that Bob Deis endured, and that waged by the local fire chief ;or the seven plus years that Jeff Pataky was targeted, these campaigns domestic terror have consequences and real mental health effects.

And I am certain that local residents aren’t always aware that this is the way their funds are being spent-and certainly each of these cities gets federal dollars as well, which makes these local occurrences a federal question. I mean-how many fires do they have in Hubbard Ohio? So I imagine those engines, and the fire fighters in them aren’t very busy with anything OTHER THAN stalking Krlich.

Well known whistle blowers William Binney and Kirk Wiebe, Dianne Roark, and many more were fired for blowing the whistle on NSA spying on American’s, and the agencies then set out to destroy them. After Binney tried to stop the NSA from spying on American’s while also saving taxpayers a few billion dollars– he was fired, stalked, and indicted for it after the FBI kicked his doors in and tossed his house. And all that because he tried to save the taxpayers a few billion dollars. Remind me again- who are the good guys?

So- when the researcher of organized gang stalking encounters the question, often written in a mocking tone on the extant blogs online,  “but where do the gang stalkers get all the money??” it is usually “one of them,” mocking the impotence of the people to defend themselves against this new and horrific privacy rape, fraudulent spending, and military madness.

Of course, if you have nothing to hide-then let’s talk about who finances gang stalking, and let’s have a look at the way these massive black budgets are being spent. But stop trying to silence victims of it.Because it costs tax payers billions of dollars per year in waste, fraud, and abuse.

Thin Thread versus TrailBlazer: a 4 million dollar loss, at the expense of the taxpayers of the United States. Here is some of William Binney’s interview with Juan Gonzalez on NPR in 2012:

JUAN GONZALEZ: What—did it have a name, the program?

WILLIAM BINNEY: Well, it was called Thin Thread. I mean, Thin Thread was our—a test program that we set up to do that. By the way, I viewed it as we never had enough data, OK? We never got enough. It was never enough for us to work at, because I looked at velocity, variety and volume as all positive things. Volume meant you got more about your target. Velocity meant you got it faster. Variety meant you got more aspects. These were all positive things. All we had to do was to devise a way to use and utilize all of those inputs and be able to make sense of them, which is what we did.

JUAN GONZALEZ: And when they didn’t use your system, they—the NSA developed another or attempted to develop another system to do the same?

WILLIAM BINNEY: Well, that one failed. They didn’t produce anything with that one.

AMY GOODMAN: And that one was called?

WILLIAM BINNEY: Trailblazer, yeah.

AMY GOODMAN: Trailblazer, and—

WILLIAM BINNEY: I called it—I called it five-year plan number one. Five-year plan number two was Turbulence. Five-year plan number three is—

AMY GOODMAN: And Trailblazer cost how much money?

WILLIAM BINNEY: That was, I think, in my—my sense, was a little over $4 billion.

AMY GOODMAN: Four billion dollars.

WILLIAM BINNEY: Right.

AMY GOODMAN: But it was scuttled. It was done away with in 2006?

WILLIAM BINNEY: Yes, ’05, I think it was. But yes, that’s right. And we developed our program with $3 million, roughly.

Decorated intelligence officer William Binney’s sworn testimony here.

While on the surface, a casual researcher of organized gang stalking might not see the correlation between police and fire departments, and bloggers, and whistle blowers, most legitimate alternative media does see it; and legitimate psychologists can make the link. Further, in the cases above, we see the pattern: whistle blowing or challenging officials; real estate investments, federal dollars,well connected and well organized groups in positions of trust, and narrative control- who can and can’t have a job in modern America to pay a mortgage; and then, massive fraud on the courts and the localities that have no idea this is going on, thanks to the collusion of some in mass media, influence operations, and psychology.

So, when a psychologist might say (as Dr. Michael Wood said) “well, the term itself doesn’t appear in the literature,” or that ” these people who claim this all show clear indicators of delusions,”you can point them here, to this one article, and work your way back from here. While each case may be different in it’s facts or in it’s “onset” it is indisputable that it is a real thing, and it is very well financed.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s