The organized gang stalking dialectic online: academic research shows that it is a real phenomenon, based in modern policing techniques, and modern technology.
Bob Deis was the City manager of Stockton, California, which was, and still is, a city in financial trouble. So when he began to do his job, and get to the bottom of a city financial crisis, and budget resources to alleviate the burden on the city of excess waste, he cut some money here and there, trying to save costs. One of the places he suggested that the city could nip a little bit was the police pension fund. As can be expected, and like many cities across America, the police union was having none of that.
So, they took action against Bob Deis-personally,maliciously, and vindictively, in a years long campaign of harassment. As reported on NBC news channel KCRA3, the police union bought the house right next to Bob’s house, and began construction. Here’s that video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDnXlAkq8yE
At all hours of the day and night, the house next to Bob’s became a circus of construction-hammering, pounding, banging; cars coming and going, revving engines, idling for long periods of time. Loud conversations, and strange noises at all hours. Finally, Bob couldn’t take it anymore, and after 20 months of service, he stepped down as city manager.
Many other odd occurrences happened in and around Bob Deis’s life, some of which was purely Orwellian. While he himself did not write a blog about his experience, nor did he “go postal,”what he did do, eventually was that he stopped his source of income-he imploded upon his own ability to earn a living from the City of Stockton; and he got the message loud and clear: if he didn’t do what the police union wanted, his privacy, his peace, his life was over.
In the online narratives of organized gang stalking, many frequently cite the fact that gang stalkers will move in next door to you, and wage noise campaigns. Some 75% of every blog I have read about gang stalking make this exact point, which I will demonstrate later.
So, one thing is obvious: noise campaigns as a form of harassment have been documented, by people like Bob Deis, the former city manager of Stockton, CA. And, they were also documented at the height f the civil rights era, when the Ku Klux Klan waged similar campaigns; and when real estate agents red-lined neighborhoods.
Why don’t you call the cops then?
While little of what these victims report sounds rational to the casual reader, and little of it seems plausible at first glance, and even less of it seems to be a legitimate narrative of reasonable persons, these stories often appear disjointed and indicate that the authors are under high levels of stress, and possibly suffering from mental illness. In many if not all of the narratives, the reader is forced to ask themselves” well, why doesn’t this person get help? Why doesn’t that person call the cops?”
And the answer to those questions is plain in the case of Bob Deis and several other of the well known cases online: the answer is when the cops, working with other city functionaries, under the veil of impunity and the color of authority- when the cops are the ones doing it, who do you call? This, by definition, is intimidation, harassment, and corruption. And on a wider scale, this is by any definition, is how a police state operates. When these cases show up online or in the courts, it is frequently said that these are isolated incidents, and that their are a few bad apples here and there.
Sure, that’s true. But as we see all across America today, the bad apples are talking to each other, and logging into and out of social media, and cataloguing interactions with citizens in massive databases that are interlinked. Now, some of the stories about bad apples are going viral, and indicate that policing itself has changed, and I will suggest, that it is not changing for the better.
Organized gang stalking is primarily a model of community control, that likely had it’s origins in the Reagan era of drugs, guns, and gangs. Communities were under siege, and gangs were out of control; new models of policing had t be created to deal with the threat, and broken windows policing was the tool of the day. Congress poured money into local state and federal police packages to fight the scourge, and police departments grew and grew. Communities created community groups, neighborhood watches, and alliances with government programs and agencies.
Funding poured in, even if we had to take loans, and grow the deficit to fight the war on drugs, as bad guys were pouring in at America’s seams, and slipping across the border in armies of drug addled madness.
Keeping an eye on bad guys costs money-lot’s of it, and because bad guys are crafty and clever, sometimes we have to bend the law a bit to do what the community asks-that in order to put ’em away, we must sometimes “do whatever we have to do on that day,” to get’em.
As the real criminals and gang members were locked up, killed or deported, in part due to the illegal spying of the DEA on millions of phone calls, and the storing of dossiers’ and data in a massive database called the SOD, it was merely coincidental that this was also a massive breach of Constitutional due process, because American citizens asked, and law enforcement answered. The bad guys were losing, and who could complain about that? And besides, a new endless war was afoot, with no end in sight, as the war on terror had begun.
In all of that, a vast and unaccountable, police infrastructure was militarized, and communities were mobilized against the bad guys. If you see something, say something, because databases have a tendency to get hungry and hungrier. And spy agencies to this day have not actually caught a single domestic terrorist using these databases, by most official accounts. In fact, the FBI, using access to the NSA databases has caught some 92 domestic terrorists, and the vast majority of those were targeted with extensive, years long began to move the goalposts from spying on bad guys, to spying on the associates and friends of those who were deemed bad guys.
Then, in the case of Bob Deis above, they moved in next door, and spied on him when he attempted to trim some fat from the budget. And when it comes to tightening the belt, we’re all in this together-right?
The parallel universe of fraud upon the courts, unconstitutional searches, and massive coverup’s.
Fast forward to the point today where marijuana is legal in many states, and methamphetamine has replaced Colombian cocaine, foreign gangs are not nearly as visible, or capable as they once were. Those tasked with stemming the tide of gangs and drugs had done a good job- but then were faced with an even more horrifying specter: that the vast bureaucracy that was built on drug money, and the militarized police mechanism might lose funding.
The problem with building big fabulous tools like the DEA and the NSA is that there is never a reverse gear, never a draw down mechanism, and certainly never a tighten the belt reflex. Police bureaucracies only and forever expand.The Drug Enforcement Agency, which was tasked with controlling the flow of drugs began t turn inward, targeting ordinary Americans for petty crimes, and when the drug flow was tapping out, they needed to keep tabs on something-anything, in the Special Operations Division database, which while sharing similarities to the NSA databases, were more focused on American’s than foreigners now.
When the news picked up the story that the DEA was spying on Americans without warrants, and keeping a massive database full of dossier’s, the agency went into damage control mode, and fast and furiously, within months of it being reported in main stream media that this was happening, and just as the news was breaking that the NSA was wiretapping the world, they claimed that they had destroyed the database. Which didn’t matter because in fact, all of the top level agencies had been using illegally obtained data for years, using backdoor deals with the NSA, and covering it up, because in fact, many cases of the pre-Snowden era were based upon fraud upon the court! Or, in legal speak “parallel construction,” a process whereby American’s and others are spied upon, and then, the information stolen from them unconstitutionally was used to ‘reverse engineer’ crimes, and then, the agencies withheld even that fact from the courts-meaning that this massive fraud on the court was not discovered until people had been convicted.
Burn database, burn.
But not so fast, perhaps, would have been more prudent approach to simply lying and saying that the database had been destroyed(which denied untold numbers of citizens the chance for legal redress), as the SOD database contained recordings of calls, and recordings of associations of American citizens who were not even suspects in any crime, nor involved in the drug trade. Evidence, in fact, of state level crimes against the Constitution.That database abuse was the precursor to other news stories, about other databases that were being used to compile dossier’s on bad guys. And the good guys, remember, were doing all of this for the children, and to fight foreign threats to domestic American’s-right?
So if that was the case, why did the DEA ‘burn it’ before the rest of the citizens even knew it existed? And what, exactly was in that data? If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear, and all that-right?
In all of this, a new picture of America emerged, one where the official story started showing cracks, and where the official sources themselves were committing criminal acts, outside of a legal framework overseen by any judge, anywhere that could never pass a Constitutional balancing test. And the stories online of odd occurrences, and strange stalkers also grew.
And bloggers were arrested, and put on lists, and journalists were tailed and surveilled. The new enemy, it emerged, was anyone and everyone who knew about, or talked about these covert activities online. The DHS threat assessment tests replaced due process, and those who spoke about individual liberty became targets of investigations. People who use cameras to photograph police brutality became suspects, and the use of camera’s became a nearly criminal act itself.
The growth of the organized gang stalking online community followed the use of hidden, secret and massive databases, that are combined with the use of ‘predictive’ software.’
It is in this climate where the online community of organized gang stalking, and its targeted individuals also added new tools to their repertoire, tools like the users manuals that describe the hundreds of devices that the government uses to track and trace and database ever growing lists of bad guys. And tools like new news sources and media outlets that reveal government to be spying on it’s citizens, while main stream media insists it’s all on our heads, that the official story is in fact, facts, because some anonymous source said so; and carries story after story where one official after another lies to the peope about the domestic spy plots they have hatched upon us.
And as journalists exposed these databases that follow our every move, and track our every purchase; and that monitor our online conversations in real time, and create mind maps of individual speakers and whole conversations, across platforms, and across the globe, new patterns emerged in the data available to ordinary citizens too, chief of which were privacy tools, like encryption.
So, OGS, which is also called multi stalking, cause stalking, community mobbing, workplace mobbing, and several other names is not an absurd or irrational set of beliefs, nor is it a mental illness related phenomenon, though complaints of being spied on has long been associated with mental illness, paranoia and schizophrenia.* What organized gang stalking is in fact, is most often a collaborated effort by state and federal and sometimes international actors, working with local police departments across America and under the umbrella of “community policing” to eradicate crime, and create safer communities. That sounds like a good idea indeed-who can argue with that?
But we now see that in fact and practice, their version of safer communities includes eradicating our rights of privacy, and every singe right that was birthed from that alone, because without privacy, no one is actually acting under anything resembling free will, and cannot exercise free speech, nor communicate in any meaningful capacity to form free association, or even-and especially during the war on ‘terror’-to practice free religion.
I can, and I will. I will make the argument that the organized stalking schema is also infused with religious motivation on many levels, and actually a concerted effort by certain groups working within certain institutions to enforce their version of morality upon individuals who range from activists and political dissidents to whistle blowers and others who challenge social order. That those who engage in organized stalking are in fact and practice little better than mob rule, and that from within the hidden and cowardly bastions of database abuse, and the infiltration and manipulation of electronic communication channels; that these are no longer invested in making communities safe, but rather,some elements within our law enforcement and investigatory agencies have in fact moved on to the next level of theoretical maintenance of public safety-protecting themselves from being seen as subverters of democracy and democratic due process, far beyond the mission of serving and protecting citizens, they are now attempting to form, and conform them, and destroy them if they cannot be ‘reformed.’
These individuals from within certain elements of law enforcement culture and practice are using these databases and selecting targeted speakers, waging a hidden war on ideas, and the individuals who hold influence, and who promulgate new ideas; that these hidden actors are also in fact waging a hidden campaign of conformity through intimidation, and they are working behind the scenes to create not merely safe communities, but compliant and conformed communities, outside of the view of the majority of citizens, the courts and judges, and well outside the parameters of established law. The net effect is that these campaigns are political soft force attacks on due process itself.
I am writing this paper primarily for the use of the victims of organized gang stalking, so they can begin to understand the scope of their problem, but also, as a reference for psychologists, social workers, and journalists who work in the free, alternative, and independent media, who are the most likely to encounter this dialectic.
But also, and with extreme prejudice, I write this so that criminal defense lawyers, civil rights lawyers, human rights advocates, and especially, Constitutional law scholars who will eventually come into contact with the idea of organized stalking, are urged to examine this phenomenon, and use this paper as a resource to combat a growing disease in western societies, and developing nations- the disease of apathy and malaise regarding the laws of civilized society.
In the organized gang stalking dialogues, you will find exact, articulable, and actionable legal claims, and the dialogues themselves indicate other legal arguments that the checks and balances of a free and democratic society have been broken at the individual level and broken by hidden law enforcement “investigatory privileges,” which are being abused at a rate exceeding the era of civil rights legislation- and that by allowing agencies to utilize gang stalking on “targeted individuals” as a “privileged law enforcement investigatory technique and practice”- our whole society has become threatened by something far worse than gang-bangers, petty criminals, and even hypothetical terrorists and pedophiles (which are, statistically, very rare, and then, are most often found in positions of trust and authority)- and even organized crime: we are becoming two tiered, two position thinkers, devoid of reason or self-will; fascists, who only respect power and authority, and that, because of this hidden practice.
While no one in any civilized space would object to safer communities, and few would resist law enforcement agents doing “whatever they have to do” to put bad actors behind bars, we must ask ourselves, post Edward Snowden, and at the juncture of sacrificing liberty for the sake of security, if indeed gang stalking and its partner in the subversion of democracy-community policing- is in fact and especially in practice, the way to ‘get the job done.’
This point is an essential ingredient in the arguments against endless war, at any cost, and with the mantra “the ends justify the means.” As such, I offer a discussion point for any future dialogues about the ‘what is’ of organized gang stalking, but also the ‘ how does this affect us all’ question that is implied when we overlook the rights of the individual who is experiencing this. And even the casual observer of the dialectic of gang stalking will readily observe that due process, and simple Constitutional practice in principle is not being respected, or preserved in these cases. This is the pivotal crux of all of the gang stalking arguments-at what point in an organized society do we allow the rights of the individual to be ‘sacrificed’ for ‘the greater good?’
MY answer is and always has been, that any organized society MUST follow the law-there simply is NO GRAY AREA. However, Congress, the courts, and judges-whose opinions are influenced, controlled, and purchased-blackmailed and compromised by international finance- these cannot be our arbiters of freedom any longer, after they themselves have turned the blind eye on the scales of justice. Justice-the dragon that she is- has scales, and those scales are rudely torn off of her body when we allow hidden practices to rule the courts, and subvert the laws of democratic institutions.
This paper will attempt to address these questions, Constitutional crisis, and legal gray areas, in layman’s terms. I will point academic researchers to the appropriate resources and also, identifiable human sources who can be interviewed, or otherwise studied; but I will forego the standard academic citation format to do so, because the majority of the population that seeks information about this topic are often marginalized individuals with few resources, and even less comprehensive scholarship to understand what they are experiencing. These are often in desperate and despicable circumstances, and sometimes under pressures of life, health, and death- these seldom read academic citation’s.
Organized gang stalking is, primarily, a human rights issue of our times. As such This paper is written for them- those who have been selected, or culled, marginalized and blamed for their activism, their obstinate dissent, their counter-culture or otherwise non-mainstream views. It is for these that this is written, and i ask those of you n the legal professions, the media, and the human rights advocacy professions to take notes. Organized gang staking is one piece of the puzzle that we as members f free societies are trying to put together, in order to make our nations whole again, after this takeover by the military industrial complex, it’s banking bosses, and it’s armies of paid disinformation agents and crisis PR professionals.
In this spirit, I ask you, the reader, to read on, and dispose of the “conspiracy theorists,”and the “mind controllers,” and the “electronic weapons and DEW’s” crowd-and read the facts for yourself. And, I will tell you about myself, and those I have encountered in this community, and eventually, my own experience with “community policing” where LEO’s work with institutions of power to destroy individual lives, stifle dissent, destroy activists and distort democraatic processes through bulying, blackmail, and hidden manipulation.
What is organized gang stalking?
As we know it today, organized gang stalking is an ancient practice, though it’s names have changed through time. Political movements, organized religion, law enforcement, corporations, and institutions have all been documented using nefarious bullying tactics that involve investigation, intimidation, and surveillance. Many have commented that it is the work of the intelligence agencies, the FBI and COINTELPRO, or colloquially, the devil, or satanists, or masonic orders and secret societies that work beyond the reach of the law, and beyond the insight of the ordinary person to uphold, maintain, enforce, or alter the social order.But in reality, it is those who are so deluded with religious toxins and then, vested with some form of authority or another banding together to re-inforce their beliefs and force them onto others. It is mob rule by biblical narrative.
As such, a classic example from pop culture that references the practices of this “devil” is the well known song by the Rolling Stones, where Mick Jagger croons ” Please allow me to introduce myself, I’m a man of wealth and tastes.” He then goes on to sing about places in history where the hidden work of the devil has left a mark, ranging from the crucifixion of Jesus, to St. Petersburg and the atrocities of the bolshevik revolution, ending the stanza’s with the phrase “Pleased to meet you–hope you guessed my name.”
The instances cited by Jagger of course implies that the name of this entity is hidden and unspeakable, that it is forbidden, and subtly implies that the mere speaking of it can bring the aforementioned trouble upon the speaker.These same can be described as perverse incarnations of the Pharisee’s, and the devil itself. But they can also be described as Jews, and the associated Abrahamic religious affiliated or derived cults and sects. Jews, Catholics and Protestants all have their own occultists and their own hidden social distortions that have infiltrated secular society and activate for things like “Christ in Culture,” and more.
Please allow me to introduce myself
I’m a man of wealth and taste
I’ve been around for a long, long year
Stole many a man’s soul and faithAnd I was ’round when Jesus Christ
Had his moment of doubt and pain
Made damn sure that Pilate
Washed his hands and sealed his fate
In American communities of Jewish-Christian dominated, zionist and dominionist indoctrinated culture, most people so indoctrinated can identify with the heretic challenging prophet Jesus, aka “Yeshua Ha Nozri,”, the half Jewish, half Roman son of his mother, Mary. Whether you believe in the Jewish telling-that he was a child born in the condition of being a bastard, and that, likely conceived during his mother’s period, or whether you believe that he was born as a prophet to a woman who was a pure and sacred Virgin the facts agree that Jesus was gang stalked.
The evidence for the gang stalking of Jesus is as simple, and as factual as the quasi-historical narratives about his life- Jesus had big problems with the Pharisees, a sect of Jewish culture and religion that was petty, trifling, sneaky, cowardly, and ready at any moment to defame you. Any person can read these ‘facts’ in the Bible. In fact, much of what Jesus experienced before he was murdered by niggling legalistic fanatics is also experienced by those who claim they are gang stalked, slandered, and being stalked to death:
Matt 23:31-33 “Therefore you are witnesses against yourselves that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets. Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers’ guilt. Serpents, brood of vipers! How can you escape the condemnation of hell?”
John 18:2-3 “Then Judas, having received a detachment of troops, and officers from the chief priests and Pharisees, came there with lanterns, torches, and weapons”
In context to modern times, some of the troubles of Jesus can be directly related to Biblical times, and also, cultural practice: Jesus was stalked, and maligned behind his back by groups of individuals who sought to entrap him in speech crimes- in Jewish culture, the law that governs speech, and attempts to govern or destroy people based on words alone is the laws hat surround”lashon ha-ra,”or “bad words.”
I will not waste time indulging in that useless subject other tan to say that it applies today, as such as it did in the time of Jesus, because there are as many bullying cowards and back stabbers today as there were then, if not more. And speech crimes and he regulation of words and ideas is every bit as profitable to networks of cowards as it was then. You can look it up, in a dusty bible.
The word is indeed mightier than the sword- and those who practice organized stalking will kill you for words alone. Which is why peaceful non-violent resistance is the answer-and raising awareness.
Speech prohibitions in general have a long and sordid history in all “modern” cultures. From the trials of heretics under the Jewish-Christian Inquisition, to the Salem witches, words to some are scary, devilish things that indict and often challenge powerful and wealthy benefactors of oppression. (Intercept article-this week) As such, free speech and the resistance by some to adopt oppressive constrictions has led to harassment of all kinds, bu particularly, hidden means and methods of controlling individuals who value the one freedom that exists in all f us regardless of wealth status or social position- we all have the ability to speak, and use words.
However, for those who have a stake in oppressing speakers- and those who profit fom stifling dialogues- speech is the chief and largest threat t their version of a “social order.” Hence, the term “organized stalking,” because those who perpetrate this diabolical form of social control believe that they are doing it for the preservation of society- their version of society. And that version, “organized” according to their version of “order.”
So, organized stalking simply means in this case, that those who have power use it to intimidate or threaten, manipulate an oppress those who challenge their version of order.
Organized stalking is neither a new phenomenon, nor is it a phenomena in and of itself. It is in fact and practice, a diabolical way that societies throughout history have been influenced, from hidden practices. The examples of organized stalking are so numerous throughout history that these examples would require an entirely separate novel. In that light, most people of our times are aware in some way about the bad practices of Communists, or fascists, or others who used human rights violating tactics and practices of social control. The Nazi’s are frequently cited as having used “brownshirts,” who were bullies from many levels of society who oppressed selected groups an persons. The Maoists are well documented using secret police to indict an entire generation of scholars and community leaders, often wit deadly results.
And the Russia, East German Stasi, and even Israel today used Jewish “atheists,” “bolsheviks,”and “zionists” working with police powers to violate every due process and human rights law from the cowardly cover of hidden investigative practice, and database dossiers’ to manipulate key individuals, and subvert social movement and progress across many societies. Others work to maintain the status quo. These cases and facts are by now well documented in many forms of literature, and academic scholarship.
So, what gang stalking is, in the modern context, is entirely related to this collusion of Jewish-Christian narrative to hide presence and achieve it’s goals in secular society, which I will demonstrate later in this treatise. It is undeniable that gang stalking is a primary tool of Jewish-Christian social and narrative control, that control being a mechanism of not only the rudimentary gatekeepers of storytelling and mythological guidance, but also, a “deep state” mechanism of subversion of free speech, and more.
Organized stalking is, in fact and practice, an unethical, and often illegal practice and set of practices whereby Jewish-Christian factions wage domestic war on individuals, communities,ideas, and implementation of ideological challenges cross each and every western, and westernizing society. As such, one can view them as many biblical legalists do- as a necessary poison with which to sheep dip individuals and debilitate alternative thought; or, as a handy tool whereby those who have power can gain more of it, because they operate from within power structures with impunity.
What are the different types of stalking?
All organized stalking shares certain features that appear at first glance to put them under one umbrella, but this has only served until now to marginalize both the community, and the individuals within that community, because it negates their personal narrative and fails to validate their individual experience, or urge the researcher to examine these cases deeper. And because this dialectic is one where those with power are actively abusing it, many who seek information on this topic are discouraged from seeking the heart of the matter, and also, intimidated from asking the right questions.
In the rare instances where mainstream media report gang stalking. Across disciplines, ranging from psychology to journalism, to law enforcement, when
So, here below, are the many forms of stalking that are mentioned online, and frequently appear together in the research:
Law Enforcement Stalking: Most, if not all organized stalking involves actions and inactions on the part of law enforcement agents and agencies. Most notoriously are the cases of so-called “mass shooters,” “active shooters,” and many of the cases that major media describes as “domestic terrorism,” but these labels and these cases are nt so easily relegated to such a simplistic narratives because they all indicate involvement on many levels, and over periods of time spanning years, of involvement with law enforcement agents, agencies, and agents provocateurs.
The most famous case of a “school shooter” for example, was the Columbine massacre,” where Dylan Kliebold and (..) shot up a high school in Colorado. On closer examination, we see a very odd-extremely odd- set of circumstances arise: the shooters were not only involved with the son of the FBI agent who took the lead on the investigation, but aso, that agents son filmed a dry run of the shooting a year in advance of the actual event.
For most people-rational, average, reasonable people, this fact would be a red flag. But for the majority of Americans, in the modern climate of constant fear of terrorists both foreign and domestic- they are unaware of this connection. Why?
The answer is very simple, and sadly, very un-American: everyone is afraid of the power of law enforcement agencies to destroy their lives. This, by definition, is the key element that defines the answer to the question :what is a police state?”
In the case of Columbine, which has been memorialized as a textbook case of bad kids hurting good kids, and law enforcement dong a “great job” after the fact of multiple homicides, we see something else emerge from the data: an unquestioning “faith” in law enforcement narratives a near blind obedience to semi-mythological telling’s of tales, told by “official sources” who bought time, and padded their pensions based on half truths and the creation- the actual creation by manipulation and actual bullying of real people who ended up dog really bad stuff. This has became the new normal for some in America who derive their sustenance from the crisis creation industry. And, that crisis creation industry is at full health today, socially engineering constant fear of unknown enemies.
Fred Hampton was a member () The FBI snitch who set it up as a (..). David Koresh was a (…). The FBI agent who sold him the sawed off was a (..).Randy Weaver did (…). His dead child was a (.)Jared Loughner did (.). The Newton boy was a (..)Tamerlan was found in a boat, scawling words in blood many years after the FB was ade aware that e was a targeted individual, Aaron Alexis was a (..), Myron May did (…) just after he tried and tried to tell LEO’s about “his” problem. Sayed Farook did )..) as he endured workplace harassment form a zionist Supremacist. Omar Mateen did that (..), after encountering people who were blackmailing him about his sexuality, and his connections t the gay community; Christopher Dorner, Gavin Long, and so many more-and whose up to bat today?
What all of these share in common is this: while some claimed gang stalking as an exacerbating r precipitating factor (Loughner, May, Long, Alexis, Dorner) these were the few who articulated this “phenomenon.” but in fact there is more- so much more. One who has the funding or the initiative and endless amounts f time can validate this thesis, and be richly rewarded But the basic facts speak loudly for themselves, and indicate that in the worst cases of organized stalking, it is readily evident that these victims share the commonality of police involvement for long periods of time before their events, And, that of those who tried to report to law enforcement, they were rebuffed as ‘mentally unsound.” in the least, or “clinically symptomatic.”
Another corollary is that one of them specifically espoused a right or left wing agenda, but the so-called left win which is actually neo-cons, benefited in the analyses after the fact. Jared Loughner claimed he was phrased at a liberal college. May, a Cristian wih ties to Christian foster care operations, claimed no clear political affiliation, though the foster care operation he was tied to is a known Christian hub.
Aaron Alexis had no known political affiliation, or political ax to grind, but he did have a security clearance, and a shot gun inscribed . Gavin Log was clearly motivated by African American issues, but specifically denied adherence at black supremacy, while also touting black independence, which has always been a threat to he FBI and it’s zionist sponsorship, via the ADL.
Christopher Dorner represents a case of the worst possible outcomes of workplace mobbing, and clearly was challenged by the diversity initiatives of the political spectrum. The LAPD bullied, stalked, harassed, defamed, and then, burned him to death after his rampage, rather than give his claims a hearing in a court room.
All of these and more remind a researcher of the case of Saddam Hussein, the former president of Iraq, who was hunted and ten murdered before he could tell his side of the story- that in fact, he had no weapons of mass destruction, and, in fact, he also has many secrets about how the game is played.
It is very interesting how uninterested psychologists and psychology is in examining hese cases. even more telling that psychologists, and psychology as a profession allowed those in their communities t participate in and oversee CIA torture, black site interrogations, as well as Guantanamo Bay abuses that continue to this day. Not only is organized stalking low on the list of things for psychologists to examine in depth, but it s also, conveniently. and easily relegated to mental illness, rather than beleaguered messengers seeking willing recipients of horrible messages. It’s a broken loop communication.
Religious-many churches and many if not all religions practice some form of stalking, and these of hidden practices and allusions to superstitious events to enforce conformity to doctrine and community. An easy example for most people is the butt of all gang stalking jokes and analogies, the Church of Scientology. Many online stories detail the nature of this type of stalking, and books have been written that detail it as well(..).
However, lesser known is that Christian churches, and especially Jewish cultural organizations are heavily invested in controlling individuals who dissent from their religious regime, or who challenge their ideological controls.In fact, Jewish groups received 97% of DHS funding in calendar year (..) to use for whatever they want to see it for, in whatever black budget operation they see fit to use it in.
But Catholic’s notoriously have their Opus Dei, and quasi religious organizations have teir Skull and Bones, or their Klu Klux Klans. Lutherans and Methodists; atheists and secular humanists generally do not show up on the radar of organized stalking complaints, although recently, atheists have had some instances of organized stalking.
Mormons have historical records of the Whistling and Whittling clubs of Nauvoo, where gangs of organized youth would stalk and harass outsiders, using large Bowie knives to intimidate them, and drive them away from the often incestuous and perverse world they inhabited.Not surprisingly, today, the FBI, CIA and NSA actively recruit Mormons.
Today, we can see online echoes of these events, as the FBI actively recruits Mormons, and some online accounts implicate both state and federal agencies, as well as the FBI and Mormons in child trafficking, and stalking. (cite the whacko in San Bernardino)
Organized– most likely, organized stalking is the umbrella under which all stalking complaints can be filed, and this term most likely had its origins in the RICO era where off the books methods, and quasi legal tactics were deployed against organized crime.
. Because international intelligence agencies send data down the chain of command and control of individuals who are targeted, the data makes its way eventually to local law enforcement who then develop custody and control plan for those targeted.
So, because these operations are by definition “black operations” their may or may not be a record of how well they are organized, or the who what when where and why of the organized disruption of targeted persons, but generally it can be shown and indeed is indicated that all complaints of organized stalking are in fact, organized.
gang-this is the most common term on the internet, and it has the longest history of use going back into the 1980’s, when drug money was flowing through America, and gangs were prolific. Also, this term shares with it databases that catalogue individual who are gang members, and even family members and school playground associates of gang members, and these databases can destroy a persons life by association alone.
Cal gang database is one for the most cited but there are many others, and some of them remain hidden from journalists, lawyers and the courts. (cite OC case, and Calgang, but also the intercepts recent case.)
multi– often, police work with community organizations, and institutions, as well as psychologists and social workers to surround certain targeted individuals with the hidden presence of organized stalking. The FBI uses the Countering Violent Extremism program to do just that, and these cases involve multiple institutional contacts, and multiple events and interactions, hence he term “multi-stalking.”
cause- Cause stalking can easily be identified based on the complainants particular case. Many cases that involve domestic violence, elder or child abuse fall into this category, but so too does religious stalking, and political cause stalking. In the last election cycle, many noted the underhanded tactics of the Democratic Party leadership, and much of these complaints fall into this category.
The best documented cause stalking example is that of the 3rd wave feminist Nikki Craft, who advocated that men who are rapists, or could be rapists, regardless of innocence or guilt, should be stalked and harassed, and publicly humiliated. Interestingly, Ms. Craft was arrested some 17 times, and barely did a day in jail, whereas men who are arrested are most often ruined for life.
Other notorious cases of cause stalking are the modern sex panic hysteria industry, whereby the dialogue of saving prstitutes and saving children is implemented in the narrative. Actual sex workers who happily ply their professions and write their blogs online are often harassed by multi-million dollar cause based crisis PR firms that derive their income from provably false claims tat women are forced into prostitution, as opposed to choosing it. This ’cause’ has it’s roots in the era of 1920’s eastern European secular Jews exploiting impoverished girls and women, but also crops up in the modern era as Muslim’s are integrating into western societies.
community– The great majority of cases of organized stalking instances involve whisper campaigns and behind the scenes manipulation by police powers who interact with community groups, institutions, and organizations to control or inhibit, or otherwise influence and manipulate individuals who they deem a threat to their version of ‘society.’
So, these campaigns involve the agents of law enforcement acting under color of law, and the pretext of moral, civic, and often, religious authority. The classic and best documented cases are the fire chief in Ohio and the case of city manager in Stockton Califonia, but also the case John Lang of Fresno, CA. Many bloggers have experienced tis form of harassment as well.
workplace– this has long ben a problem in the American workplace. In the 1960’s and 70’s the common phrase was “going Postal” meaning that pst office workers went n rampage shootings due to workplace harassment. Today, these are common as well, and they take place in the isolation of individuals who do not fit in to the environment they work in.
Best case is Sayed Farook, and Omar Mateen, and then Lester the newsman, but there are many more.
flash mobs– A Google search will of the term flash mob will indicate the potential use of social media and app’s that can help groups organize events where mobs of followers show up. Social media like Twitter also reveals the power of this medium to organize for or against issues, and the individuals who espouse them. But also, these reveal the power of the internet, and the ability for it to be misused to harass, isolate or otherwise intimidate individuals. The alt-right, zionists, and Christian dominionists use this medium effectively to stalk and harm individuals, as shown in the presidential election of 2016.
While social media has this capacity, it must be noted that police and other intelligence agents and agencies use these tools to monitor activists in real time, using massive databases loaded with “predictive” software, and horrifically powerful tools of marginalization, such as Palantir, and Media Sonar, as well as many unknown programs that use algorithms to target individual online speakers.
Then, as we see with the DHS schema, and its collusion with law enforcement to wage behind the scenes, long term, and chronic investigations, these types of software have the capability to track, locate, target, and influence any individual speaker who uses them. Particularly noteworthy in the online community of organized stalking victims, we see the complaint that they are “monitored 24/7” and that large groups of non-specific, hard to identify individuals stalk them, and seem to know where they are at at any given time. This is the power of cell phone surveillance, combined with social media monitoring, and private contractors who work with the DHS and other LEO’s to target speakers online, and off.
I use the phrase organized gang stalking for two reasons: one is that it incorporates the two most common terms used in the dialectic into one phrase that triggers Google search results. So, while “gang stalking” is the current most popular search phrase, organized stalking is closing in on it, due to wider awareness of what this is.
The second reason I use the phrase as I do is that the term gang stalking is a loaded phrase, and it has been used by law enforcement to signal to each other online. And due to the relationship between ‘official sources’ and journalists, psychologists and so on, the term is used to sheep dip those whom it targets in order to discredit their stories, or more importantly-their side of the story.
Because the nature of and methods used in organized stalking border on the illegal or illicit, and frequently cross ethical and moral boundaries, when a person first becomes aware of this term, it is often under the duress of an investigation, or while they are enduring harassment by unknown entities, agencies, and individuals during a stressful period in their life.
I first became aware of the term after I had incurred he disfavor of several powerful persons and organizations in a community. While I have never sought to be political, I was forced by certain injustices to become involved in activism for many causes aand against other causes. In my personal case, I was aware from an early age that social movements are subverted from outside entities who work with police and communities to stifle grassroots ideas and while political movements. These have massive budgets, and they use those budgets to subvert democracy.
To give an example of current political situations where the elements of OGS can be viewed, I point to the recent election of President Donald Trump.
The nexus of the eradication of Constitutional liberty, and the erasure of due process and Constitutional rights: Fusion Centers, general warrants, and database abuse.
When protesters practiced their first amendment rights in Boston, airplanes piloted by the FBI swept up each and every electronic signal from every computer, cell phone, and smart tablet-every single signal of every single wireless device of every single person within a (..) radius of the protests. This wasn’t just protesters whose data was swept up- it was grandmothers sending SMS messages with pictures of their grandkids; business executives calling Wall Street, and anyone else in the vicinity(..).
All of this data, obtained without a warrant, was then sent through what is called “Fusion Centers” which are the de facto aggregators and distributors of illegally obtained data in each and every jurisdiction across America(….). No one knows what these centers “do” and few records are kept of what types of activities they monitor, who monitors them, or how they select individuals for extra monitoring, outside of the purview of any court, and outside the view of any non-government citizen. What is known is that these centers then act as the chief due process violators of whoever they choose to target, for whatever reason people are targeted.
What IS known, however, is that these centers act as clearing houses of data, and that they have the ability to onitor each and every citizen in their jurisdiction n real time, and collect data into dossiers. They also have the ability to target each and every commubication of any targeted citizen, and to also interact directly, indirectly, covertly and overtly with those targeted. Fusion centers are the nexus of communication between federal, state and local law enforcement that target individuals.
As revealed by Edward Snowden, the NSA has wiretapped all Americans-each and every one. And along with that, this agency deployed software programs and databases using shell corporations that were given startup capital by the Central Intelligence Agency. Then, when American’s failed en masse’ to be shocked or even rallied to outrage, the NSA then opened those databases to 17 other intelligence agencies, who are currently using this data to mine each and every American citizens privacy, associations, and more.
But that’s not the worst of it, as some have long known or suspected that this was the case.
When examining claims of organized stalking then, we can add
and psychologists, social workers, homeless shelter volunteers; and each and every organization that receives funding from federal agencies had been using this data for years before the NSA scandal was revealed. The FBI particularly has shown a propensity to use the backdoors built into the NSA databases to create cases that target American citizens, as does the DEA, who notoriously wiretapped tens of millions of phone calls without warrants fr decades, and when their misconduct was discovered, they destroyed their database (SOD). Some have drawn a parallel between these acts, and the actions of the CIA when it was discovered that they had been practicing mind control and human experimentation on American subjects, against the law(…).
Today, the head f the FBI, James Comey who once notoriously took a stand for liberty,as he charged into the hospital where the head of the DOJ (Ashcroft, Comey, Rumsfeld) is now patently against it. Recently, he has led the charge for not only the erasure of privacy, but also to re-institute the general warrant provisions of King George in the 18th century. Comey has himself taken a stand that general warrants-one of the main reasons the American Colonies revolted against the King of England-are now necessary and very American(..). And that, with a straight face.(…)
In light of the above, it is not irrational, nor is it entirely outside of the jurisdiction and scope of inquiry of any court on any matter civil, criminal or otherwise; from the downtown court to the district courts and appellate courts to dig deeper into any events stated in any suit, and examine what else might be happening behind the cloistered doors of these centers. And certainly, what I describe above indicates that the narratives of those in the online community of organized gang stalking who claim they are specifically and absurdly targeted are within the realm of probability, and the details of their narratives must be examined in that light.
On the origins of hidden social control mechanisms and practices becoming the de facto rule of “law”: Rico, to family courts, to today’s NSA surveillance
One might ask about how such a hidden practice with such dire consequences as those described by victims of organized staking describe could take root in America, the land of the “free.” I will discuss this later, in context to the founding fathers and the difference between “freedom” and “liberty,” which is a crucial distinction under the Constitution, and the intent of the founders of America, the men who wrote the declaration of Independence, and those who financed the American revolution.
From Thomas Jefferson, to Thomas Paine; from Haym Solomon to Sacajawea, the intent of the founders clearly indicated that liberty was their goal, despite the obvious hypocrisy of their era as regarded the native population, servants and slaves, women and minority religions.
The phrase “What is hidden shall be brought to light” is a common phrase found in many blogs about organized stalking. The origins of the phrase are biblical, and stem from Babylonian times through Torah teachings. Masonic orders, and mystics often use this quote, as do secular people who are aware that what is hidden-occult by definition- shall be revealed. A common derivative f this is the propaganda meme used by the German Nazi Joseph Goebbels, who famously used the secular Jewish Edward Bernay’s teachings to say that ‘ a lie will travel the world a thousand times before the truth wakes up.’
These two teachings are inseparably related, and integral to the organized gang staking dialectic, for several reasons that deserve a detour.
The FBI today, working behind the scenes with illegally and unethically obtained dat from te NSA or Israel, is seeking to become an intelligence agency, modeled after the Stasi of East Germany during the cold war, which was essentially an organized blackmail scheme on a national level. The Stasi community control program which the DHS is modeled after (,,)was based in dossiers filed with truth, lies, speculation and defamation of those that the East German rulers considered threats to the official dogmas and protocols of an oppressive regime. There is little to no doubt that organized stalking today is operating in similar ways, and that the what is hidden component of this regime here in America is an implied blackmail of every American citizen-that databases full of information have ben carefully compiled, stored, and now as we see it coming to fruition-these databases have been given to 17 agencies to cull the American population of its secretes and lies, its business and shenanigans.
so, again- the complaints of those relatively few who were bold enough to ty t describe their afflictions of being stalked and harassed by unknown agents who sought or still seek control over them are not unfounded in the least, and in fact, are magnified in light of this(….) recent revelation.
The basis of my complaint: I will not under any circumstances sacrifice liberty for security-yours, or my own.
To understand the basic element of the deprivation of rights under color of law from which organized stalking denies citizens due process, and every right stemming thereafter from it, we must distinguish between freedom and liberty, as the founders held it:
“Of LIBERTY then I would say that, in the whole plenitude of it’s extent, it is unobstructed action according to our will: but rightful LIBERTY is unobstructed action according to our will, within the limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’; because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual.”
“Give me LIBERTY or give me death.”
“He that would make his own LIBERTY secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.”
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, LIBERTY and the pursuit of Happiness.”
–Declaration of Independence
These statements above are widely believed to be essential to the American democratic foundation, and that freedom as we speak of today is measurably different than the slavery of it’s day, and the slavery that is impending upon us today as I write this. And notably, liberty is spoken of as something distinctly different than freedom-in fact, freedom is not mentioned as a concept in these early writings at all. That concept came many years after the founding fathers, and only then in reference to the opposite of freedom, which is slavery. These are binary and opposed paradigms of the state of man. Liberty, on the other hand, is not binary, and the constitution recognizes that elemental difference, in the 9th amendment, which preserves rights not yet enumerated (9th??).
The 14th amendment(??) is the one wherein freedom was incorporated as a Constitutional right, and equal protection under the law. It is important to note that the equal protection clause was put in place only after the many and several other clauses and amendments to the constitution, and that, a hard fought and hard won right that had previously not been specifically enumerated….
When discussing organized stalking then, in context to the Constitution, it is most evident that it shares a similarity with the dialectic of the era of emancipation: runaway slaves were pursued mercilessly by official agents of both states and private interests for recapture. The means and methods of pursuit, the treatment these slaves received by their captors, and the community involvement in their recapture varied across narratives, and across counties, and state lines.
Organized stalkings little friend: the Five Eyes nations, Israel, influence operations, and the collection of ALL data to target specific vulnerable populations.
When the average American citizen was caught up in the “war on terror,” some of us were caught up in the war against the Constitution. Myself, I was a young journalist who wrote a story about a terrorist, and I indicated tat this man was likely unstable, possibly mentally ill, and whose arrest and detainment echoed McCarthyite era hysteria. As we see time and time again, my narrative has been vindicated repeatedly in mainstream media, and in alternative circles-it is a widely confirmed fact that the FBI essentially creates terrorist plots, and uses unstable individuals to foment them.
But that isn’t the worst art- the worst art is that then, after they create the plot, manipulate the terrorist, and then make the arrest, major media runs the story that an “al Qaeda/ISIS/boogieman du jour” has been disrupted, which is far from the case. It is almost as f the FBI itself is embarrassed to be part of these events, but well aware that they will receive more finding from next years Congressional appropriation based on the statistic alone, regardless of the veracity of their version of hand-crafted reality.
One wonders “exactly how do they pick the [terrorist/rapist/pedophile/black marketeer/petty criminal]needles from the haystacks?”
Or how do these hero’s of liberty hone in on a suspect, and discover a plot, and then disrupt it to save the children and old ladies? The short bus answer is influence operations, under color of internet, and color of authority to do so, but only after they have gang stalked them in a database.
copyright 2017 christopher m. flood
This is a literary work in progress.